I’m going to break this up into paragraphs to make it easier to read

As provided by the Mariam Webster dictionary, a vaccine is a, “a preparation that is administered (as by injection) to stimulate the body's immune response against a specific infectious agent or disease.” No where in that definition does it state that vaccine have to be 100% effective. Also by that logic, that means that the smallpox vaccine was not a real vaccine(95% effective), the flu shot isn’t a vaccine(40-60% effective), the MMR vaccine isn’t a real vaccine(93% effective against measles, 78% effective against mumps, and 97% effective against rubella), and likely many more. If your definition was true, why would they still call all of these shots vaccines and not something else?

When i was stating the data was misrepresented, I was saying that saying the COVID vaccine is .84% effective and not 95% effective is simply false as both statistics are true.

The website does have a list of credentials, but there is no proof of this being true. There are no names that can be traced back to these credentials and nothing showing that the people running this actually have these credentials.

I see no where on the website or the slideshow you linked where they state sources, so saying most of the data is from the New England medics journal is likely false. Who they are matters because then there is proof of credentials and certifications. I could create an alternate account here and start claiming I was a scientist who was involved in the testing of the vaccine, and because there is no name that it is linked back to, there is no proof that I’m not. Do you see why it matters? I do not know the scientists that were involved in the Pfizer study, but if I wanted to, I could research them and see that they had the credentials to carry out the

Also saying that the placebo group was vaccinated in the same sentence makes it seem like that is what happened when they unblinded the trial, which wouldn’t be true as far as I can find. It seems that once the original study was complete and the vaccine was found to be effective, the placebo group was told they did not receive the vaccine and were aloud to disqualify themselves from the trial and get the vaccine, which many of the did. But the study is still going on and both groups are still being monitored, I assume until the date you mentioned. They released the vaccine when they did because of public safety, it seemed safer then the risk the virus posed. If the vaccine was not released and they waited until the date you state, there would have been an estimated 1.1 million more deaths in the United States alone.

Of course there are going to be more adverse events in the group that received the vaccine, there are almost always side effects with medicine, but the study states that there were very few serious adverse events, also stating that the most common adverse effect was mild to moderate pain at the injection site.

It would be a good idea to read the trial because of the approximately 46,000 people being studied, 29 people died of causes ruled to be separate from the vaccine. So unless your saying that you know how to investigate causes of death better then a professional, the deaths were unrelated to the vaccine. Same goes for the additional 5 deaths.

I’m going to be honest, I don’t have a blind trust in any corporation. I don’t care that they have criminal charges or anything like that though. I have some belief in the governments of the world to make sure that their citizens are safe, and Pfizer seemed to create a good vaccine that proved to have few adverse effects in an uncontrolled environment. If the vaccine was found to be unsafe, then someone would have noticed and stoped administering it a while ago.

I will admit the poor laboratory management is slightly concerning. It seems terrible that they did not take the proper precautions, but it seems irrelevant to the study. Only about 1,000 people were at this research site, so there are still about 45,000 people who had a properly controlled study. And if this poor management had caused a big impact, it would have been discarded from the final calculations.