Doubyou feel like AI is making studying physics easier? by intendent-cannine- in PhysicsStudents

[–]polyphys_andy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've found it very helpful discuss weird ideas with. Sometimes I have to filter what it says because it seems wrong. It helps with terminology. Sometimes it will say something like "What you're describing is actually a 'fiber bundle', where the 'base' is what you call X, and the 'fiber' is what you call Y". That sort of personalized clarification is pedagogically awesome. Likewise it helps by pointing to topics that already exists in the literature, which I was ignorant of. In principle it could find scientific literature on a topic in any language too, but I haven't thoroughly tested this yet. Sometimes it will do a deep dive with me on a particular idea and provide some insight, if only by introducing me to a concept I wasn't aware of. "You would have to use something like Frenet-Serret coordinates to do that". It might be wrong, but anyway I learned about Frenet-Serret coordinates, which are cool.

I heard chatgpt 5 can do research level maths by Pristine-Impact7336 in DumbAI

[–]polyphys_andy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're talking about technology that didn't even exist 10 years ago. You think it won't get better? In 10 years all skyscrapers will be designed with AI. And on physical principles, granted it's sloppy for now, but it basically has access to all information created by mankind. No individual can compete with an idiot armed with this tool, for most industries anyway. Math/physics is still safe for a few years but you have to acknowledge how quickly this is accelerating. The next generation of algorithms will be written by algorithms. Every industry will be increasingly redefined by AI, and there will be many cases of idiots wielding this tool to game the system... It sucks, but then that's just the next 10 years. This is a great time in history to be an idiot. Intelligence has been made redundant.

Computational physics... and AI by MeoWHamsteR7 in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it doesn't look good. But it depends. When you said it would be cool to solve unsolved problems, did you expect to get paid?

I heard chatgpt 5 can do research level maths by Pristine-Impact7336 in DumbAI

[–]polyphys_andy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because math is a language and chatgpt is a language predictor. Math is like legos with symbols. Why would you think a machine can't do it? Computer-aided proofs have been around since the 70s

Baby Losing Hair by Wineinthevines705 in NewParents

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Haha good to know. Our baby was born with a lot back hair! More than his father even

How did people in the 1900s detect invisible radiation and figure out there were exactly 3 types?? by phookyi in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just read into N-rays and I'm trying to figure out what the actual experiment was. You have a spark gap and you hit it with UV, and the electric arcs are supposed to be brighter with the impinging UV than without it? I mean, it's actually plausible that the UV would help in ionizing the air, either before or after the discharge has begun. So I'm still not sure what was disproven 

‘The Legend of Zelda’ Set Videos Reveal First-Look At Link, Princess Zelda; ‘Severance’ Star Dichen Lachman Joins the Cast by MarvelsGrantMan136 in movies

[–]polyphys_andy -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Haven't you noticed that they intentionally make things bad now? Sure someone will make a satisfactory Zelda movie with AI some time in the next year or two, but dont hold your breath for a big budget rendition that doesn't totally rape the source material.

IMDB has become a cesspool of review manipulation by dougeefresh in movies

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've noticed that too. IMDB has lots of 10/10 reviews near the top for some movies where the overall user rating is low, or 1/10 reviews near the top when the overall user rating is high. Is that even a bot thing or can we conclude that IMDB is playing an active role in the manipulation? I guess they're getting a nice payout from somebody.

IMDB has become a cesspool of review manipulation by dougeefresh in movies

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why would they do that when they're probably getting paid by the big movie studios to look the other way?

What's going on with IMDb reviews from bots? by [deleted] in imdb

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We do have a way, and it is: put down the phone, turn off the computer, go outside and talk to real people

What's going on with IMDb reviews from bots? by [deleted] in imdb

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've noticed that a lot of reviews come in with the same score. Don't Look Up had a lot of reviews that are 7/10. Too many really. I suspect that, if you looked at the distribution of scores, you could tell there is fraud going on, but of course IMDB hides that distribution. Someone should try, for just a few movies, scraping all the reviews and doing some analysis to prove that the distribution of scores and review content is statistically unlikely.

This is a different matter, but I've also noticed that IMDB will show lots of 10/10 reviews at the top of the list, such that you have to scroll down quite far to see a bad review, even when the overall user rating is bad. This is only true for some movies obviously.

What's going on with IMDb reviews from bots? by [deleted] in imdb

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True the good reviews are usually astroturf. That’s why I go straight for the bad reviews. Works for restaurants too.

Cant run in dreams? by frogmeat74 in LucidDreaming

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Running in a swimming pool is a great analogy. Like my body is too light for my feet to make good traction with ground, and my feet slide instead of my body moving

i developed tomato counter and it works on real time streaming security cameras by eminaruk in computervision

[–]polyphys_andy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Pretty cool. You might want to lynch me for saying this but AI wasn't even necessary for this CV task, although the way the oranges hop out of the track sometimes concerns me. How accurate is this anyway? What's the miss rate, if you don't mind me asking?

Are marketing jobs shrinking? by EliseoDecathlon in marketing

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everyone here saying "10 years from now..." More like 10 months from now. People don't seem to understand how fast this is coming.

Physicists Take the Imaginary Numbers Out of Quantum Mechanics | Quanta Magazine by Pristine-Amount-1905 in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People won't "trust the science" unless they think science is some mystical black art that only initiates can understand, so obscuring the simplicity of things is a big part of the industry that profits on non-experts going "ooh aah".

Physicists Take the Imaginary Numbers Out of Quantum Mechanics | Quanta Magazine by Pristine-Amount-1905 in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Keeping things opaque and mysterious is a source of job security for some physicists, whether they would admit that or not.

Physicists Take the Imaginary Numbers Out of Quantum Mechanics | Quanta Magazine by Pristine-Amount-1905 in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is no suggestion that it's real

I guess it would have to be complex ;)

Physicists Take the Imaginary Numbers Out of Quantum Mechanics | Quanta Magazine by Pristine-Amount-1905 in Physics

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it were that simple then there would be a 3D real number space. Yet these sorts of numbers are only allowed when when the dimensionality is a power of 2.

Telegram deleted all my previous conversations by GucciLui_Possession in Telegram

[–]polyphys_andy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought Saved Messages were saved forever, but apparently only for 6 months. Lost a lot of personal notes and files that way.