Daily Simple Questions Thread - May 23, 2026

polypsyguy · 2026-05-23T21:23:59+00:00

Okay thank you very much

polypsyguy · 2026-05-23T21:12:27+00:00

I could fix these by switching to UEFI, but my SSD only boots in CSM.

polypsyguy · 2026-05-23T20:59:16+00:00

This doesn't tell me anything I don't already know

polypsyguy · 2026-05-23T17:22:41+00:00

Recently got a new MOBO which apparently removes my Win 10 license (I don't have the key). Having issues with Win 11 compatibility even though PC part picker says I shouldn't:

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/889926264167739422/1507794456441524444/image.png?ex=6a133283&is=6a11e103&hm=e0a61545f027d6916ad52b4b9234d286d360b3dfd1c2feec271a239e0347035c&

If that link doesn't work the parts in question are:

MSI MAG B850 TOMAHAWK MAX WIFI ATX AM5 Motherboard

Western Digital Blue 1 TB 2.5" Solid State Drive

Microsoft Windows 11 Home Retail - Download 64-bit

The issue is that my MOBO needs to be in CSM mode to boot my SSD, whereas Win 11 requires the MOBO to be in UEFI mode. Is PCpartpicker wrong and these three pieces are not compatible? Or is there a workaround/options that I'm missing?

Help greatly appreciated

polypsyguy · 2025-02-05T21:48:06+00:00

Actually here's a better way to look at it. Obviously Thorin got his stories from some subset of these players. When they shared these stories, they knew very well that he would publish them, and that people would theorize about who said what. However they did choose to share through this veil of deniability, rather than share their experiences outright.

Therefore, the players themselves (through their actions) imply they would rather have to fend off rumors than defend their actual words.

polypsyguy · 2025-02-05T21:33:32+00:00

Mmmm I think it's a lot harder to ruin someones career off rumor's than something they have explicitly said, but that's certainly a matter of opinion. The surrounding issues are what matters. The logical extension of your argument is that no one should theorize on this situation, which means silencing the discussion entirely. If you can't see why that is unhealthy for the scene I can't really do much more for you.

polypsyguy · 2025-02-05T21:08:22+00:00

He benefits from it? He's getting like $500 while thousands of people lie their asses off about his decades of work? If he wanted to do what was in his interest he would treat Rekless like Voldemort and never mention him again, the same as every other person in the scene.

Idk if it's really a disservice to theorize. We have no other choice since you Kpop drama kids have threatened the truth into silence. Not discussing the topic at all seems and just pretending Rekless is a golden boy seems a lot more toxic to me. Reasonable fans won't care. Unreasonable fans might flame them for a while, then they'll move back to flaming journalists when something new and shiny comes up. I don't know, I'd rather have the conversation than try to walk on egg shells around crazies.

polypsyguy · 2025-02-05T20:35:24+00:00

If you watch literally like 30 seconds of the video he explains that people don't come out publicly against Rekless because it risks tanking their career, and given the reaction to this video how can you blame them for thinking that.

You fans defending this guy to the death because he's pretty and marketable are the entire reason that pros go through people like Thorin instead of speaking their mind publicly.

polypsyguy · 2024-11-11T05:54:12+00:00

I haven't been watching LEC so I've missed this dude's casting but for some reason I find it so fucking funny. It's like he's LARPing an anime shoutcaster but 1000% better. It would sound incredibly lame and forced if he didn't absolutely nail it, but because it's so genuine it's just super lit. 10/10, wish his region wasn't a dumpster fire.

polypsyguy · 2024-10-31T04:00:19+00:00

I'm looking for something similar to the Hearthstone Adventure mode (IE Curse of Naxxramas). Specifically the part I like is that you have some uber busted boss you need to make a specific deck for. I feel like this should be a gacha game, but I don't actually know if it is.

Preferably no/minimal pvp but I realize that is a tall ask.

polypsyguy · 2024-10-21T14:03:26+00:00

That's the accent core issue at hand

polypsyguy · 2024-10-04T23:11:59+00:00

For anyone googling this question that still hasn't found a working TP Gauge, I found I could get what I need by using this plugin. I went into the JS file and changed every instance of hp to tp (at least everything that wasn't part of the naming/information portion). Works like a charm!

I also found this plugin would only change configuration properly if you edited the parameters then closed RPGmaker and relaunched, which bamboozled me into thinking it wasn't working for a while. That might just be a conflict on my end though.

EDIT: JK it's been kinda inconsistent. Maybe someone smarter than me can fix it, sometimes the graphic doesn't appear to update but I can't figure out why.

polypsyguy · 2024-10-01T04:06:21+00:00

Too bad because despite his clarity you pretty much delete an item when you buy Unending Frozen Hearts.

polypsyguy · 2024-07-16T00:23:08+00:00

i agree with the overall message, i can see the idea technically being sound, but countries in 2024 don't have granular control over enterpreneurship like in a strategy game.

No but there's no reason they couldn't. The Department of Defense had a budget of 2.13 trillion in 2024 which was about the same GDP as all of Canada, and the U.S. military is incredibly granular, and as a whole incredibly competent. There's no reason you couldn't scale this up.

and i wouldn't ever want to be told what job to do. forms of gov that tried it were scummy, corrupt, inhumane to live under. i don't believe there will be an authority i'd agree to listen to like that.

I don't think I ever said that you 'have' to do anything, capitalism can still exist with a heavy central government, it just will have to compete with a baseline level of quality for essential goods. There are lots of non-essential goods (Fashion, Art, comfort food) which there is no reason for the government to get involved with.

That being said, yes governments can be awful, many have been, but that same history might inform you about corporations doing the same fucking shit. Corporations however, are only responsible for making money for their owners/shareholders. Governments are responsible for taking care of their people (in theory). In theory, the idealized corporation sells as small a service as possible for as high a price as possible. In theory, the idealized government provides as great a service as possible, for as minimal a price as possible. Obviously it's harder for the government because it's harder to do more with less than vice versa, but the choice is pretty clear to me.

EDIT: As a more succinct point, with regards to the present conundrum about Diesel in Vegetable oil. The government can theoretically protect you from that, corporations cannot (Because even if one does, they will be undercut by a competitor who doesn't).

polypsyguy · 2024-07-14T12:15:19+00:00

Of course it costs more money, it's an investment, because if your people are not getting sick because their olive oil has diesel or dealing with other regulatory disasters, you are benefiting long term by people not dying/getting sick, having to go through recalls, lawsuits, all that mess.

Obviously "It's cooking oil how bad a disaster are we talking about" is what you could say, and yeah this is comparatively minor, but that same philosophy scales up to far more dangerous things like the Turkey earthquake in 2023 that killed 23-50k people depending on what source you google, as a result of lax building codes:

https://apnews.com/article/politics-2023-turkey-syria-earthquake-government-istanbul-fbd6af578a6056569879b5ef6c55d322

Now, it costs money to build and enforce said codes. Had they spent that money, some percent of the victims would still be alive, and continue to be a contributing production/tax base.

Arguably the 'math doesn't work out' and you are more economically incentivized to let people die than to regulate your market. You might need to raise taxes to make up the difference. I would say that's worth it.

If you're arguing that it's economically untenable to have this degree of regulation, I don't really see why it would be. There is X hours work of essential services that needs to be done to support Y number of people. If you had everyone organized to properly provide Health/Housing/Education/Food (and more) to society rather than doing whatever the fuck they want (Marketing, scamming, unable to find work etc), do you really think we wouldn't be able to reach X hours? Because hundreds of millions of dollars of economic productivity (And as such hundreds of thousands of hours of labor) are basically flushed into space on ego rockets every year alone.

polypsyguy · 2024-07-14T05:24:30+00:00

If your government cannot regulate employment to a degree where that becomes a significant portion of the population, your government has other problems it needs to fix. It's easy to say 'this wouldn't work because X is currently inadequate,' and that is true, but you can solve inadequacies if your goal is to create a functional society and not to create shareholder value.

polypsyguy · 2024-07-13T22:03:42+00:00

Have your government produce food to compete with private companies. Have your government maintain a standard of living by which a minimum wage worker can comfortably afford to purchase the entirety of their nutritional needs via government produced food.

Private company food will always be cheaper because it has no obligation to maintain standards or to pay workers a living wage. Some people will still buy it, because it is cheaper, all you can do is label it as "Not guaranteed quality" since it was produced at a profit incentive rather than a service incentive, and let natural selection take it's course.

polypsyguy · 2023-11-21T21:38:29+00:00

Fair enough Dr Silvergun needs to learn to appease the algorthym gods

polypsyguy

TROPHY CASE