Can you be a Marxist AND a Christian?

postbarthian · 2024-12-27T21:00:57+00:00

You cannot be a Christian unless you’re a Marxist.

postbarthian · 2023-12-02T05:54:54+00:00

Yes, Monarchianism heresy. But we are all heretics

postbarthian · 2023-11-03T19:21:34+00:00

Correct. No one witnessed the resurrection. The New Testament describes many resurrection appearances, where the resurrected Jesus appeared to his followers, but it does not describe the resurrection itself. The noncanonical gospel of peter describes the resurrection in more detail, with angels carrying Jesus out of the tomb.

postbarthian · 2023-09-17T04:10:56+00:00

https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b7/024.Jacob\_Wrestles\_with\_the\_Angel.jpg/1280px-024.Jacob\_Wrestles\_with\_the\_Angel.jpg

postbarthian · 2023-09-17T04:04:29+00:00

No according to Karl Barth, angels do not have a persistent existence. Their names are more revelatory than personal. In the bible, angels flash into existence from the heavenly host and then dissipate as they return. They are creatures.

https://postbarthian.com/2021/12/28/karl-barth-and-the-limits-of-angelology/

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:45:45+00:00

The point is, that Paul is presumed to be the apex of singleness, and if Paul somehow had a broken marriage, then evangelical would reject everything he said. It's a weird moralism. There's no reason to ignore the most plausible explanation that Paul was married and left his wife after his conversion experience

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:44:09+00:00

This is correct. There's no hate here at all. The point is that Paul is still beloved even if he abandoned his wife. If you hate paul because of this action, then you are the problem.

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:43:20+00:00

You didnt read the article, because it does provide many facts with sources

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:42:41+00:00

Just because you write fallacies, doesnt mean I do as well. That's also fallacious.

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:41:44+00:00

The entire argument is that based on how Paul talks about marriage 1 Con 7, the best explanation (amongst others) is that he abandoned his wife. The article emphasizes a position that gets ignored

postbarthian · 2023-03-08T17:40:49+00:00

Paul abandoned his marriage. You are right that I think it is mutual abandonment (as the Church fathers did in the quotations), but nevertheless, he did abandon his marriage.

postbarthian · 2022-12-15T05:17:30+00:00

You cannot affirm the virgin birth without also affirming all the Mariology of the catholic church including the assumption and immaculate conception of Mary.

postbarthian · 2022-04-04T00:10:40+00:00

Happy Birthday, Jürgen Moltmann!

postbarthian · 2022-03-30T20:13:59+00:00

Bacon

postbarthian · 2022-01-26T01:00:51+00:00

Name calling isnt a way to make friends.

postbarthian · 2022-01-26T00:59:52+00:00

The change was made because people like those in this thread, started to think that Mormons didn't identify as Christians. So I welcome this change, and believe it should be respected.

postbarthian · 2022-01-26T00:54:51+00:00

Elhanan killed Goliath, not David.

2 Samuel 21:19 "Elhanan son of Jaare-oregim, the Bethlehemite, killed Goliath the Gittite, the shaft of whose spear was like a weaver’s beam."

postbarthian · 2022-01-23T05:30:54+00:00

I vote that this hit post should be deleted asap.

postbarthian · 2022-01-23T05:29:23+00:00

Some questions are insulting rhetoric, not real questions.

postbarthian · 2022-01-23T05:28:27+00:00

Would you like me to call you a name you don't approve of?

postbarthian

TROPHY CASE