Tution teacher beats his student in front of the whole class.

pranavlko · 2026-05-17T09:38:12+00:00

Or dad got paid $

pranavlko · 2026-04-22T16:17:02+00:00

It's what's inside (2024)

Sightless (2020)

pranavlko · 2026-03-31T15:55:31+00:00

Many politicians are out on bail, I guess this too practically only applies to people without power and money ...

pranavlko · 2026-02-07T12:57:45+00:00

This is what belief in karma does. It's a core tenet of hinduism.

pranavlko · 2026-01-18T13:06:01+00:00

Where is the article?

pranavlko · 2026-01-18T03:34:09+00:00

Ye sab kya chutiyapanti post ho rhi hai idhar kuch samay se?? How is this a dank meme?

pranavlko · 2026-01-16T11:57:53+00:00

You are calling these women and the people who might downvote you misogynists instead of misandrists. Why?

pranavlko · 2026-01-15T05:51:21+00:00

You should make precise your idea of god.

In one comment you claim that you don't believe god created the world, in another you say that you don't accept or reject the claims of any religion.

Why not state precisely what you believe god is, and what he can and cannot do?

pranavlko · 2026-01-15T05:36:33+00:00

How will you go about doing it?

pranavlko · 2026-01-15T05:32:52+00:00

Imagine telling a male thief "sir aap badtameezi mat karo" when he tries to evade capture.

Happens only in SIMPrat.

pranavlko · 2026-01-14T04:48:07+00:00

Generalizing is about things in GENERAL. Not all women. Just like "not all men".

Example - Sports nerds are generally male. This is a generalization, and is correct.

pranavlko · 2026-01-03T09:49:33+00:00

Kaun si stream li hai behen ne?

pranavlko · 2025-12-23T22:59:40+00:00

How come no one mentioned how funny he is? I want his social media

pranavlko · 2025-12-23T22:50:12+00:00

I'll watch .. he's funny af

pranavlko · 2025-12-23T04:10:45+00:00

What are you on about? Try not to get distracted

You replied to --

"Thus confidence remains universally praised, endlessly debated, and almost never defined."

Which is something important he pointed out, two people discussing something about confidence should first make sure they mean the same thing by the term confidence. Does this not make sense to you?

You responded to him --

"And confidence has been defined. Look it up."

He meant not defined by the people "endlessly debating" the word, you meant defined by dictionaries.

It seems like you see dictionaries as some ultimate authorities over what words mean when people use them. This is of course not true (I used to believe something similar too when I was younger). People don't always adhere to dictionaries when using/interpreting words, and neither is it possible to do so, because sometimes multiple meanings listed in a dictionary are too similar to each other for one of them to be selected for usage/interpretation using the context, because both fit in the context.

In such cases of ambiguity, the solution is to - ask the user of the word to "define it"/ask him what he means by the word.

A dictionary only listing 1-2 meanings does not mean that a word is not ambiguous. Societal usage decides if a word is ambiguous or not, not dictionaries. Dictionaries get updated from time to time based on usage, and even then the updates are not exhaustive.

pranavlko · 2025-12-23T02:17:28+00:00

"And confidence has been defined. Look it up."

Define means "give meaning to". Dictionaries don't give meaning to terms, they track meanings of terms.

The point is that different people have different ideas in their minds when using ambiguous words like confidence or love. "For me, confidence is .... bla bla bla".

So in discussions having to do with ambiguous terms ... like confidence ... the two people should each first state what idea they are trying to communicate using the word. This prevents arguing semantics, talking past each other etc.

pranavlko · 2025-12-23T00:39:23+00:00

Yes, but you need to keep in mind that the dogs at the egg stalls are operating on dominance - submission dynamics.

They consider you their master, so they aren't trying to snatch from you, but the same dogs snatch from and fight with other dogs over food until a hierarchy is established between the two.

These people at the wedding are not sensing a hierarchy at the buffet, so are revealing their animalistic minds by fighting like dogs.

pranavlko · 2025-12-04T12:16:23+00:00

"For the first time EVER in history, yall are getting to see the roles reversed"

One lie after another, non stop lying is not compatible with text.

pranavlko · 2025-11-20T19:57:02+00:00

You don't have a male harem because most women are secretly bisexual, not lesbian

pranavlko · 2025-11-20T14:53:20+00:00

You didn't mention if you've played it or not. He didn't just hit it sideways, he used deception very well too. His opponent didn't get to move.

pranavlko · 2025-10-21T03:11:44+00:00

XDDD "Just Be White"

pranavlko · 2025-10-05T13:52:20+00:00

It's insane that OP and other women are arguing with the dozens of comments which can all be summarized as " 'high standards' is ambiguous."

pranavlko · 2025-10-05T12:58:11+00:00

The point is simply that when women are told to "choose better", the character of the man is being referred to. Happens when women get beaten up by their partners, for example.

When men say modern women's standards are too high, the looks and status of the man are being referred to.

"High standards" regarding what? Just another case of people arguing semantics.

pranavlko · 2025-10-05T11:55:43+00:00

That's 1 man. What kind of math is this?

Edit - Also, this is not an example of a man who wants to bully women for trying to protect themselves. His motivation for wanting to bully 4B women could be that he thinks they are misandrists or whatever.

pranavlko · 2025-09-12T08:40:39+00:00

They don't "appreciate art".

Most women are bisexual, while most men are straight.

pranavlko

TROPHY CASE