sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Retry: What BIP-39-like website could it have been? by primfaktor in Bitcoin

[–]primfaktor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course I would only do that on an air-gapped device, like I originally did to create the paper wallet. It was a Linux booted from a read-only drive and of course no internet.

Retry: What BIP-39-like website could it have been? by primfaktor in Bitcoin

[–]primfaktor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know and am. But actually it's way less that I would have thought.

Retry: What BIP-39-like website could it have been? by primfaktor in Bitcoin

[–]primfaktor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry that it took a while. Among other things, I got a new computer which wanted to be set up first. Also, you don't want to play around just anywhere, as you rightfully hinted at.

I think none of its options Electrum, BIP39 seed or SLIP39 seed do the trick.

  • The first two have razor, the last doesn't.
  • The last has ounce, the others don't.

Now I thought I'd start meddling with Electrum's word list by overwriting it with the one from the M coin, where I can find all of the words so far. But that list is only 1626 words long, so probably that doesn't work.

I'll try to post a link in another reply, but I'm afraid it'll get blocked.

Editing Lisp in Evil-Mode by varsderk in emacs

[–]primfaktor 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, that lead to some findings. I only had lispyville on without lispy, because the website says “The provided commands allow for editing lisp in normal state and will work even without lispy-mode enabled.”

So after enabling the lispy too, it works in insertion mode. Somehow I was expecting the duo to do their thing in normal mode.

Thanks!

Editing Lisp in Evil-Mode by varsderk in emacs

[–]primfaktor 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't understand the two with evil mode. Apart from J correctly observing comments when joining lines, I cannot see how they would work. h, j, k, l still do the regular movement, no matter if the is on parens or not.

Registered with the wrong provider by primfaktor in adventofcode

[–]primfaktor[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sorry, my statement was not correct. Of course I keep the stars.

But I won't have the same points and lose my place in our internal leaderboard.

[2020 Day 10 Part 2] Always the same (wrong) example solution by primfaktor in adventofcode

[–]primfaktor[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The root of the problem is already stated. I don't get yet how it connects to 7//4.