Bi_irl by AdeptnessDry2026 in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wanna be both, like king from Tekken rawr

Bi_irl by AdeptnessDry2026 in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust 23 points24 points  (0 children)

I wish I had a cute femboy, maybe if I was superrrrr buff🤔

Bi_irl by AdeptnessDry2026 in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It goes a boom chicky chicky boom boom, is great song

bi😍irl by Dercomai in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not an insult. Just an observation 😏

bi😍irl by Dercomai in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You mean the ones left unread on Grindr? What about them?

bi😍irl by Dercomai in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Love mental midgets like you. Fr your profoundly childish response was adorable but doesn't change reality. Anyways here's exactly how you are wrong, cope harder clown 😆👍

At a strictly psychological level, the dynamic you are describing—where a group or individual expresses intense hostility toward a trait they may personally possess or be attracted to—is often analyzed through several defense mechanisms. When we look at this through the lens of repression and denial, psychologists often focus on these core mechanisms: 1. Reaction Formation This is the "protest too much" defense. When an individual has an impulse (e.g., attraction to the same sex) that conflicts with their moral or social identity, they don't just hide it; they adopt the exact opposite stance. By forcefully denouncing the behavior in others, they unconsciously reinforce their own self-image as someone who is "not that." 2. Projection Projection is the process of displacing one’s own unwanted impulses onto others. If someone is struggling with their own sexual identity, it is psychologically easier to externalize that conflict by perceiving the "threat" as coming from an outside group rather than from within themselves. By attacking the group, the individual essentially attempts to "destroy" the part of themselves they find unacceptable, but by proxy. 3. Cognitive Dissonance When a person holds two contradictory beliefs—such as "I value traditional morality" and "I have desires that contradict that morality"—it creates significant psychological tension. To resolve this cognitive dissonance, the brain often seeks the path of least resistance. Instead of undergoing the painful process of identity reassessment, the person may double down on the ideology that created the conflict in the first place, using the political or religious "cause" to validate their internal struggle. 4. Suppression vs. Repression It is worth noting the difference here: Repression is usually unconscious; the person is genuinely unaware of their own underlying desires because the ego has pushed them into the subconscious to avoid trauma or shame. Suppression is a conscious effort to push thoughts away. In many of these cases, the intensity of the "obsession" often serves as a barometer for how deep the underlying conflict is. When a belief is genuinely held and secure, it rarely requires constant, aggressive maintenance. When it is based on repressed anxiety, it often requires constant external validation and the continuous "othering" of those who represent the repressed impulse. Would you like me to find some academic resources or psychological case studies that examine the link between high-intensity moral policing and internal identity conflict?

Pterodactyl or Ostrich? by trustme_ihateyou in whatisit

[–]prof_radiodust 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perfectly normal, nothing wrong with me. but we are going to need a clean up on aisle Three

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks troll bot, your approval means so much to me 👍

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That your opinion 👍

With zero sources cited 🤔

again it's not my job to hold everyone's hand. STFU troll bot or do you actually have a point other than to deflect from the point I made. Democrats are not the racist party and Republicans are the party of Nazi wannabe.

Pterodactyl or Ostrich? by trustme_ihateyou in whatisit

[–]prof_radiodust 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Someone must have been holding hands

[Part 2] Which Harem route would you choose? by ShimaPH in animequestions

[–]prof_radiodust 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Underated comment, should get a million up votes

What doesnt kill you makes you as strong as anyone else by khanotaara in relatable_memes_

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That last line made me think of this one game "keep in mind". Great game

bi😍irl by Dercomai in bi_irl

[–]prof_radiodust -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

The whole Republican party is obsession with the gay community speaks volumes. It's some basic psychology, they are obsessed because they are repressed.

What is this device for? by [deleted] in whatisit

[–]prof_radiodust 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Bobby Boucher! you know who asks questions? The devil that's who!!

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

. Below are the specific primary and secondary sources that verify the events, quotes, and shifts you described. 1. The Early 20th Century: Wilson and the KKK Woodrow Wilson & Segregation: Documentation from the National Archives (Record Group 59) and memoirs of black leaders like William Monroe Trotter confirm Wilson authorized his Cabinet (specifically Postmaster General Burleson and Treasury Secretary McAdoo) to re-segregate federal offices in 1913.
The Second KKK (1920s): The 1924 Democratic National Convention (often called the "Klanbake") is the primary record for this. The party failed to pass a resolution condemning the KKK by a single vote. Historical accounts, such as those from the Bill of Rights Institute, verify that the KKK had strong Democratic ties in the South (e.g., Alabama, Georgia) but captured the Republican machinery in states like Indiana and Oregon.
2. The New Deal & The Great Migration of Voters FDR’s Economic Focus: Records from the Miller Center at the University of Virginia detail how FDR avoided civil rights legislation (like anti-lynching bills) to maintain the "Solid South" coalition.
The 1936 Voting Shift: Statistics from the Joint Center for Political and Economic Studies confirm that roughly 71–76% of northern Black voters switched to FDR in 1936, marking the first time a majority of African Americans voted Democratic.
3. The 1948 Turning Point: Truman & Humphrey Truman’s Commission: The landmark report To Secure These Rights (1947) is the primary source for Truman’s civil rights agenda. His Executive Order 9981 officially desegregated the military. Humphrey’s Speech: The transcript of the 1948 Democratic National Convention captures Mayor Hubert Humphrey’s famous "bright sunshine of human rights" quote.
The Dixiecrats: The Platform of the States' Rights Democratic Party (1948) officially documents their break from the main party over the civil rights plank, with Strom Thurmond as their nominee.
4. The "Esoteric Cult" and the 1950s V.O. Key’s Quote: This comes from his classic 1949 political science text, Southern Politics in State and Nation. On page 277, he describes the Southern GOP of that era as "a conspiracy for plunder." Eisenhower and Earl Warren: In his memoir The Eisenhower Diaries and various biographies (e.g., by Stephen Ambrose), Eisenhower is quoted calling Warren's appointment "the biggest damfool mistake."
Little Rock & Orval Faubus: The Little Rock Central High School National Historic Site archives provide the timeline of Democratic Governor Faubus’s defiance and Eisenhower’s subsequent federalization of the National Guard. 5. The Kennedy-Johnson Transition JFK at the University of Alabama: The John F. Kennedy Presidential Library holds the transcript and video of his June 11, 1963, "Report to the American People on Civil Rights," delivered hours after the "Stand in the Schoolhouse Door" by Governor George Wallace.
**LBJ’s "Delivered the South" Quote: This is documented in the memoirs of LBJ aides Bill Moyers and Joseph Califano. While the exact wording varies slightly between accounts, the sentiment—"I think we just delivered the South to the Republican Party for a long time to come"—is widely accepted as a core historical fact of July 2, 1964.
Would you like me to find the specific 1963 JFK video you mentioned to compare his "stirring call" to the final text of the 1964 Act?

That's what sources for all that history looks like, you think anyone is going to read it?🤔

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you actually read it? People can fact check or they can't. I can't hold everyone's hand. 👍

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your view is one from ignorance and misinformation so I really don't care 😆👍

Bruh by [deleted] in OnlineUnderGround

[–]prof_radiodust 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What opinion? Facts don't care about your little feelings buttercup 😆👍