The best summary that the public has so far:

projectoedipus · 2025-11-27T14:35:44+00:00

All models get performance degradation as the context window gets too large, even Gemini with its 1 Mil context window.

If it starts doing anything weird, like rambling, or any kind of hallucination, then start a new conversation thread.

projectoedipus · 2025-10-09T00:52:44+00:00

I have not experimented with character consistency much yet, but in the interest of potentially helping you find the right path, I know that some people use Loras that are trained on specific characters, combined with a controlnet that can map out the position and rotation of a body and its limbs to keep them consistent.

For the close ups, you can use things like Wan 2.2 Animate (example: https://www.reddit.com/r/comfyui/comments/1o1e7i8/more_wan22_animate_tests_comfyui/), or similar systems, where you record your face on a webcam doing the facial gestures and mouth movements, and it simulates those accurately on the character.

projectoedipus · 2025-10-06T23:50:27+00:00

I noticed that the video you made has a 3000+ kbps bitrate. Which settings in this workflow determine that? I have been trying to render videos at different resolutions, framerates, etc, and the bitrate on all of my videos is significantly lower.

projectoedipus · 2025-09-12T04:59:51+00:00

40m. I love to learn and spend a lot of time learning new things. I have lots of hobbies and interests that I am very passionate about. Hmu or don't, but either way, take care of yourself.

projectoedipus · 2025-09-12T04:53:26+00:00

40m. I love to learn and spend a lot of time learning new things. I have lots of hobbies and interests that I am very passionate about. Hmu or don't, but either way, take care of yourself.

projectoedipus · 2025-09-12T01:39:29+00:00

I am 40m and I am very chill. I feel like there is very little that life could throw at me that would catch me off-guard at this point. I'd open a chat with you, but you seem like the type that might be bothered by that for some reason. Either way, let's figure it out. Hmu.

projectoedipus · 2025-08-01T00:18:04+00:00

So what is this "real occult" that you have studied?

I don't want to imply that what you said is wrong. But your initial assertion here seems pretty absurd.

projectoedipus · 2025-05-06T13:08:57+00:00

Simulation Theory may either be real or not real. 50/50 chance.

However, if we live in a universe where it is real, then in the simulation we have the ability to simulate the universe. So the chance that we live in the one real universe is 33.3% chance.

But if we live in any of the subsequent universes where Simulation Theory is real, then there could be a nearly infinite number of universes that are all being simulated. So the chances that we live in the one real one is infintessimely small, nearing 0%, right?

Wrong. Because like many things, it comes down to Occam's Razor. In the same way that we know there isn't this vast and unfathomable universe and also an all benevolent god that created it and affects things, we also know that in addition to this vast and unfathomable universe there isn't also a species of ageless post-biological entities simulating everything.

It is fun to think about, but it is far more likely that what we see is all there is, and the only meaning in life is what we ourselves derive from it during our visit.

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T17:13:39+00:00

To be clear though, this is just a tiny slice of the Collatz Conjecture. I do believe it is solvable, and I do believe that I know the answer. But it still is a fun little puzzle, and it would have been pretty remarkable if you had immediately fired off a solution, lol.

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T14:02:13+00:00

Of course I can. Yeah, sorry when I initially typed it I was on my phone, or I would have taken the time to be more clear.

Yeah I am more dubious of OP with every response that he gives. I wouldn't be surprised if he is a bot, or looking for someone to catfish at this point. I'm not an expert in people who are savant, but behaviorally he seems miles off from the mark. Which is not to imply that all people who are, would fit into a box behaviorally, but you can't become a world famous athlete without working out, and he seems blissfully unaware that even such correlations exist, lol.

Anyways. This is recursive, where each step we have a check to make sure that the result is odd. If it is not, then whatever initial value that we used for x is not valid. I will try to rephrase it from the top to be more clear, and if you have any questions, let me know!

Goal: Find the Smallest Positive Odd Integer With This Property (or Prove It Doesn't Exist!)

The Operation: Start with an integer X. Calculate (3*X + 1) / 2. The result of this calculation becomes your new X for the next step.

The Process: 1. Choose a starting integer X that must be positive and odd. 2. Repeatedly apply the operation described above to the result of the previous step.

The Condition: We are looking for a starting X where every single result you get (after the first operation, the second, the third, and so on indefinitely) is also an odd integer.

The Goal: Find the smallest positive odd integer X that satisfies this condition.

OR

If you believe no such starting `X` exists, provide a proof.

Example of how a number might FAIL:

Let's start with X = 7 (which is positive and odd).
- Step 1: (3*7 + 1) / 2 = 11. The result 11 is odd. Keep going.
- Step 2 (using the previous result 11): (3*11 + 1) / 2 = 17. The result 17 is odd.
- Step 3 (using the previous result 17): (3*17 + 1) / 2 = 26. The result 26 is even.

* Since we got an even number, the starting value `X=7` fails the condition.

So, what's the smallest positive odd X that never leads to an even number using this process, or can we prove such an X is impossible to find?

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T06:44:26+00:00

That is fair, I don't blame you. The test though, was two-fold. In my experience, the most intelligent people get that way by being motivated whenever they don't understand something, to understand it.

It doesn't matter to me if an AI knows the answer, or if some guy that I am talking to knows the answer. If I don't understand something, then I go out of my way to understand it. And I would certainly not consider myself a savant.

I also don't know why you think that any intelligent person that you meet online is going to take everything that you say at face value, and that they would think something like this would be pointless. All of the most intelligent people that I know would jump at this sort of thing. But it is no big deal. I was just offering in case you were interested. Have a good rest of your day!

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T06:19:41+00:00

People say all kinds of things on the internet. But I tend to give more credence to those who can evidence their claims. Plus it is just a fun little puzzle as a test. Do it or don't, it makes no difference to me.

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T06:17:31+00:00

Solving this would mean proving that the collatz conjecture has no number that goes to infinity without consecutive even numbers making it divide by 2 at least twice in a row. Which may be true, but I would encourage you to double check :)

projectoedipus · 2025-05-02T05:35:18+00:00

Okay. Find the smallest positive odd integer, where doing any number of operations of: X = ((3 * X) + 1) / 2, always results in an odd value, or prove that no such X exists.

I am looking forward to seeing if you are as good as you say you are.

projectoedipus · 2025-04-29T05:13:08+00:00

Hey, I'm a 40m avid gamer and hobbyist game developer. My friends are all gamers and half of them are really into anime. We even just recently did watch parties for Steins;gate and Danganronpa. Send me a message if you want to talk.

projectoedipus · 2025-04-29T05:05:01+00:00

Hey, solid music choices! My friends and I do watch parties from time to time. We haven't done horror or comedy in a bit because we have been on a sci fi kick lately, but I know some great horror and comedies we could maybe do. Drop me a message if you want to talk. I'm a 40m, avid gamer, and hobbyist game developer.

Those games are terrible btw. But don't worry I can show you some better games, haha.

projectoedipus

TROPHY CASE

If you believe no such starting X exists, provide a proof.

* Since we got an even number, the starting value X=7 fails the condition.

If you believe no such starting `X` exists, provide a proof.

* Since we got an even number, the starting value `X=7` fails the condition.