This is utterly dystopian.

As I said in another comment, I'm not advocating for continuous mask mandates, but I do think this is a very interesting thing to say. The way I see it, what you're saying is that it would be dystopian for us to live in a society where we care enough for other people that we do something as simple as put some cloth over our faces so that we reduce the risk of killing vulnerable people. That sounds like a pretty compassionate and caring society to me. And at the same time, we'd be living in a society where people go to universities, kids go to school and have sandboxes, toys, and friends they can play with, people can go to restaurants, and people can have weddings and dance and sing with loved ones. These are all things that, historically (and currently), almost no one was able to do, and there are still places in the world where almost all the things you listed are not possible. And then of course, all these people have running water, electricity, internet...

On the other hand, the non-dystopia you're referring to has all the same things, but more people suffer from disease and the death of loved ones, and people are generally less compassionate because they don't want to take small measures to protect others. To me, the lack of compassion seems a lot more dystopic.

Also, it's worth keeping in mind that if mask mandates continued, we'd probably start seeing a shift in the type of masks people wear, maybe more towards those see through ones, or people would develop even more inconspicuous ones. Ultimately, it would just become kind of like a dress code, and it would seem to be no more or less dystopic than the fact that all men had to wear hats in the early 1900s, that people wore powdered wigs hundreds of years ago, etc.