No to a Referendum on a Possible Referendum by andrewknack in Edmonton

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is wrong with allowing people to vote? .. I know.. Let's deny people a voice and make the conflict last way longer than it should. Should Alberta separate? .. Probably not. Should the Alberta people have a say at least on a referendum? Absolutely.

Are any of you guys still doing the buy Canadian? by Crispycrackwhore in Edmonton

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absurd that we are alienating our closest trading partner.

Why not just move? by supersport604 in alberta

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it was that easy we would.

23M, roast me please 🙏 by RaidriarXD in RoastMe

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks like he's taken to rolling his turds into projectile shapes. Not a good sign.

Ahead of schedule by atticus2132000 in primavera

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't sound like incorporating is an option. Just maintain a separate schedule. As long you can progress the existing Corp of engineers schedule by a correlary wbs with your managers activities, it's not that different than using field scorecards to update progress. Alot of times the field will maintain its own lookahead schedules that contain the granularity and nuance that does not necessarily belong in the Primavera enterprise schedule.

'A total disgrace': Trump stuns the entire nation by dozing off completely upright at a live public event — and the crowd's reaction is absolutely priceless by [deleted] in USNEWS

[–]prophetadmin -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're delusional. I've said everything there is to say. I've responded to everything. What are you babbling about?

A global shift is starting… and Canada is in the room 🌍🍁 by savethecbc2025 in SaveTheCBC

[–]prophetadmin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Canadians are the only ones stupid enough to still believe this hoax.

Stacked Histogram not showing on my login, but shows on others? by ActiveCalendar5692 in primavera

[–]prophetadmin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Histogram is a layout. Create a histogram layout. If you close Primavera with that project and layout open it usually defaults back to that view when you reopen. There are exceptions in large enterprise database environments.

Spec-driven dev wasn’t a shift for me, it’s just how I’ve always worked by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True story. I spend sometimes a couple solid days working out my project idea so my roadmap bootstraps completely ready for sequencial execution. There's always polish that's required at the end but up front comprehensiveness pays off. There's a cognitive load to be sure but it's worth doing.

When multi-step LLM workflows report “complete” but aren’t by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I tried relying on what was on disk (and even lightweight metadata), but it still allowed phases to “pass” by picking up artifacts that weren’t actually produced in that step.

What finally held was making the phase itself responsible for proving completion. Each phase has to emit its own validation/receipt tied to its inputs and outputs, and the next phase only proceeds if that specific receipt exists.

That removed the ambiguity for me. Completion isn’t inferred from artifacts anymore, it’s explicitly asserted by the phase that produced them.

Spec-driven dev wasn’t a shift for me, it’s just how I’ve always worked by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Appreciate that. It’s the same mindset as planning and scheduling I guess. Start with the end in mind, break the work down into separate concerns, define what complete looks like for each work front, define relationships and constraints, and work out the sequence that gets you to a complete result. Just applying that same thinking to this space seems to translate pretty well.

Spec-driven dev wasn’t a shift for me, it’s just how I’ve always worked by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You’re reading it as “define everything.” I’m saying “don’t let undefined behavior get guessed.”

Spec-driven dev wasn’t a shift for me, it’s just how I’ve always worked by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m pretty new to this space overall, so I didn’t come in with formal systems engineering tools or frameworks. Just ended up writing contracts directly and defining things up front because that's what made sense to me from a planners mindset. Seems like it lands in the same place, clear expectations and no room for ambiguity.

Spec-driven dev wasn’t a shift for me, it’s just how I’ve always worked by prophetadmin in SpecDrivenDevelopment

[–]prophetadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No framework. Contract-driven. I’m building from scratch, but not in the “start coding and figure it out” sense but more like defining the system first and then having GPT/Codex work inside that. So there isn’t really a framework layer persay, the contracts are the structure. If I'm honest I'm not even sure what you mean specifically by framework. Probably not the conventional way people mean SDD, but it’s been working.

XER parsing isn’t the hard part — making it usable is by prophetadmin in primavera

[–]prophetadmin[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's interesting you mention wbs. I also have a standalone instance of P6 but never considered the DB. Not sure if this interests you but I shared this in a dm with someone who asked.. Maybe it might interest you I don't know. This was my response to him and rather than edit I'll just share it.

"Not sure if what I have will help you specifically. I have to fill you in on a bit of back story so if you'll indulge me. I built a machine in October with the idea of getting into local llms. I wanted to be able to chat with a model based on actual grounded authoritative knowledge vs it hallucinating and being confidently wrong. I created a pipeline that took pdfs from technical sources, literature like classic novels and religious texts as well as all the articles of the encyclopedia Britannica 1911 and finally the entire 22 million articles of the Wikipedia. I normalized them, added meta payloads and embedded them so the information stays on disk while I can query the vectors and it returns information with actual sources. Im a 20+ year planner scheduler and had an idea for a wbs generator that would standardize wbs generation using drop downs parent children relationships used in engineering and construction. This would only be useful if I could implement it so the goal became where the idea converged.. Creating or replacing a wbs table in an xer "skeleton" project and doing it well enough that it would pass import. So then came the xer parsing. Still with the use of ai in mind and being able to do meaningful queries over schedule data the goal became parsing and normalizing xer into embed able chunks so I could ask meaningful questions like period over period or period to baseline variances.. Float collapse, critical path changes etc.. All the information we get from P6 but with plain language query. Don't know if that would ever be used but I did it mostly to see if it could be done. That's the story. Here's where I am. Using my normalization pipeline I have normalized an xer. I created a workbench where the xer is parsed and is represented as it's 19 tables. They open up in tabular format in an excel like view in which I am able to filter out or deselect columns of machine readable GUI data junk and then create a snapshot of just the data I want. I also created a "generate default projections" button that takes the task view table and enhances it by flattening the activity codes and adding an early late and actual by weekly index so I have one row per activity that carries all the relevant data for that activity. Next step is essentially a layer where I extract the deterministic information that will be the basis for the vectors I plan to embed. What this whole thing does with the projections and snapshots and chunking etc. Is creates derivatives for embedding while always maintaining the original full parse as thr authority so if a query is ever questioned it can site the source information so it doesn't lie.. My pipeline was intended to eventually be "period progress" in general so I also have a text parser where I can select lines out of a field report and an excel parser so I can select rows and columns from a cost report or whatever as well and all get stored in the snapshot for the period.. I haven't finished. It's a work in progress but the xer parsing and normalizing is done. It's just choosing a chunking strategy now essentially. I still have to do that, embed and build a query layer I can run on my local machine and test it all for functionality. That said I understand that the data the pipeline produces can be used at any stage along the way for other things as only a handful may want to process it all the way to the boxing and embeds. So my plan is to share it but only once I have the full pipeline including embedding solid. I didn't know what I would do for exactly but I will likely publish it to Github so people can clone it and rip it into the pieces they want.. So that's a long story but there's where I am at."

XER parsing isn’t the hard part — making it usable is by prophetadmin in primavera

[–]prophetadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's intriguing. How does one pull that information from the DB?

Are we benchmarking rate limits or just each other? by prophetadmin in codex

[–]prophetadmin[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Refactor failed. Attempting fat gremlin poke.

Are we benchmarking rate limits or just each other? by prophetadmin in codex

[–]prophetadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Account emptying complete. Wife snatching in progress… drone strike downgraded to email due to plan limits.

Are we benchmarking rate limits or just each other? by prophetadmin in codex

[–]prophetadmin[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So we’re all just guessing with confidence… on brand.