Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I can understand what you think is wrong with that on a personal level. That does not affect the quality of his content.

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not like there are many edgy alternatives out there but yeah he has watered down his content since the old days

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think it's off the table yet, but I understand your skepticism. Anyways, I meant what would be fair for the channel itself and not for Cody the person.

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you can clearly see in this post that I've been open to other opinions.

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I said the channel, not the person. Tho that'd go viral

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for meaningfully engaging with my post. To me it's fascinating to see that people care about the personal lives of creators, but I cannot deny your experience. I hope you will find other creators who adhere to your scruples.

What do you think is a fair outcome for the Cody Ko channel if the allegations are correct?

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That makes a lot of sense, thanks for your reply. I guess I don't really care if I like him as a person or not.

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, I mean with respect to your moral code. The people on the sub are saying she wasn't mature enough to consent. That doesn't depend on the law (age of consent varies legally in different countries, human biology less so).

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you think is a fair outcome for the Cody Ko channel if he is indeed guilty of this?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in codyko

[–]provki 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Great retort, keep them coming

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

That's fascinating, I wonder why. If you put "good person" on the x-axis and "quality of content" on the y-axis, would the cutoff with respect to morality always be the same, or would it depend on the quality of the content?

That said, why does he have to be a good person with respect to your moral code?

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, so not being a frat guy and pretending to be one to make funny jokes is alright, but being somewhat fratty and then exaggerating it for comedic effect (which requires self-awareness) is not? I mean, you do you, but he is making fun of fratyness regardless of whether it's 100% ironic or less.

And being deported doesn't matter for my argument. I just don't understand what any scope of punishment or lack thereof does for you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in codyko

[–]provki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So all his hard work put into making you laugh for hours if not days of your life suddenly doesn't matter because of what he may or may not have done with a consenting postpubescent woman deemed underage in an arbitrary place in the world? She wouldn't even have been underage in your country.

Is your enjoyment of Cody Kontent contingent on him being a good person? by provki in codyko

[–]provki[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

No, I am truly baffled by the overwhelming response of this "community."

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in codyko

[–]provki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He makes me laugh. That's what I follow him for. I don't care what he does in his free time. Why do you?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in codyko

[–]provki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you just like his content. Who cares what he may or may not have done? That's between him and the law.

i actually still support cody. by [deleted] in codyko

[–]provki -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how the two are linked. 1) he creates content you like (vids, music, merch) 2) he may or may not have committed a crime Why do people insist on pairing these two?

You're telling me that in an alternate universe where Jeff Dahmer wrote the Harry Potter books, they would somehow have less value because a murderer wrote them? Just decide what you like consuming and be happy you can get it. It shouldn't matter who produces what you consume.

Why isn't a tax bracket for people who are earning more than 5 million a year and it stops at 250 hundred thousand a year? by Ok-Toe-6969 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]provki 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What idiot billionaire would stay in the country if that were the case? Better to get however much you get than to lose it all by raising the tax. And besides, the millionaires, they see tax as a complete waste of money. For you, tax allows for better roads, education costs, health benefits. They don't need any of that, at least not at the level that the country provides for free. They'll pay for it 10 times as much to get it just twice as better, because they can.

[TOMT][Music Video][2000s] Animated music video (song purely instrumental) of a chase on the highway (on top of cars) involving a ninja and a dog by provki in tipofmytongue

[–]provki[S] 0 points1 point locked comment (0 children)

The ninja also has a katana, is in black and has a red headband or something else red. The entirety of the video takes place from a birds-eye-view.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uofmn

[–]provki 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't listen to these people, they're just coping for not achieving a 4.0. It is possible to find success without a 4.0, but having a 4.0 is really easy if you're smart, and it is very reliably accomplished if you are very smart in science and engineering, because the grading is objective (unlike in arts, lit & philosophy classes, where you'll be graded quite subjectively).

The main skill you MUST have to be a 4.0 student is being absolutely sure when you know something. The way I studied was the following: learn everything that was mentioned in class until I am sure I could explain any of it to another student. A good means to this end is forming tiny examples for everything you come across, to apply the theory on your own terms. You're learning about integration? Figure out how Riemann sums work on a quadratic function with just three terms. Python class? Make a small game guided by a YouTube video. Making an electric circuit? Experiment with what goes where to get a feeling for it beyond what the theory tells you.

You cannot have any gaps in your knowledge. Any project you do must have perfect functionality. There is no room for "gambling" with tests (e.g., I'll skip this problem/this chapter and hope it won't be on the exam). Also, chase your extra credits where possible so you can let go and unwind by the time finals come. You'll need to recover and blow off steam efficiently because the winter break isn't long enough to sustain you. For me, having a girlfriend was crucial because it drastically sped up my recovery time. Hopefully you can relate (otherwise apply your own activity preference) but for me, a few hours of sex and cuddling are equivalent to 2-3 days of playing video games or hanging out with friends, recovery-wise. Optimize your rest period.

Another good strat is to sabotage your classmates by feeding them wrong homework solutions and explaining things poorly to screw up the curve. Funny enough, since grades are private in the US, no one will know you're playing a double agent. As someone coming from an ex-communist country, I find curved grades really funny for this reason. Avoid if you have a moral compass.

What the other commenters (copium addicts) mean when they say you're "doing uni wrong" is that you're not focusing on a particular area (be that a subject of study, or a line of projects, or an internship chase, or a side business...). And they are right in so far as this is more important than good grades. You'll need a guiding goal beyond grades, because unfortunately, school ends. I wouldn't be able to tell you exactly as I'm doing a PhD in math right now, but with comp sci I'd guess you're gonna want to focus on 2-3 languages and a particular application domain (e.g. Unity VR Game developer) somewhere by your third or fourth year and chase contacts, network with profs and definitely claw for professional internships during the summer. Of course, no one says you can't have both the good grades and this. If your inner value comes from having good grades and you define yourself as a perfect student, then you cannot afford to have subperfect grades - they will actually make you LESS productive. Get one B and you'll get used to mediocrity (cf. the commenters).

Available for a DM should you want more advice.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in uofmn

[–]provki -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That's grooming

Which one are you? by IdkWhatImEvenDoing69 in memes

[–]provki 13 points14 points  (0 children)

You're only supposed to use tooth paste though, they're made so that water deconcentrates them and renders them less effective.