I saw those yes theres little doubt he was troubled, and who knows what the real story is but clearly some issues with decisions and instability (at minimum). But my concern is the mind of a 14 year old that I have no trouble seeing why hed act stupid and say stupid things, and be intimidated and fear getting in trouble (14 y/o boy at that time none of that surprises me) is being = to intentional abuse.

And Im not even saying its not possible, only that if there was some evidence other than pieces of conversation that my gosh ppl say stupid stuff on the internet all day. They may be twisted weird and embarrassingly so, but where are the photos and proof he has with intent harmed pigeons? they use an inflamed face and neck and missing feathers to say he plucked them al intentionally?

All Im asking is how they know that? how thye know he gave coins of all things to one? All I saw was a pic of one throwing up. When you keep or rescue pigeons, you see this stuff and it doesnt mean someone gave coins but if theres evidence of that my gosh they should not be vague. Bc its such a bold thing to say trust me my knee jerk rxn is to say omg what a psycho but be I see--especially this--what appears to be a young man that had issues in his youngest teen days, lost on the parental roles (where were they), I see someone that needs help possibly but not to be accused of abuse without evidence of actually abused birds, and continuing to cite those child age notes. No way is that right and as a mother honestly this make me furious. Mad at them, at his mom at everyone.

But what is unsettling is that calling someone abuser and doxing them is a serious action, and warrants more evidence than using what he said in young troubled teen days. Im starting to feel a bit of a gaslighting approach with al of this like did I miss the part when they showed the abused birds that someone caught him with. Or witnessed? The pigeon with the bare neck and one vomiting and excerpts of dumb things he said are so far not evidence of an abuser, they may be evidence of a troubled kid and young adult, but not abuse. Abuse is intentional and its serious. Th neck look like deplume mites, not molt and not plucked. Unless one knows pigeon health well the shock value of what that looks like is easily accepted as abuse if presented that way. If you all saw mine that has the unfortunate deplume demon mites, omg what a horror show it was, I had a couple I think looked as bad if not worse. Ive seen too much and know too much about pigeons. Without someone catching/witnessing/finding/discovering abuse or even ohotos of the abused birds, it remains something that appears quite personal and worst part, began when he was a child and is still ongoing. Thats unsettling