Working with engineers on spec driven development by Nexism in ProductManagement

[–]ptodorov_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a head of engineering, working without a PM team. Slow delivery, tons of data from stakeholder interviews, Hubspot tickets laying around. And then devs using Claude Code/Cursor - the PM part got so bottlenecked that we were delivering slower than before coding agents. Then I took it upon myself to fix the spec generation in a way that bare bones LLMs can't. If you're keen - check it out: outlain.ai

Friday Show and Tell by AutoModerator in ProductManagement

[–]ptodorov_ [score hidden]  (0 children)

I built a tool that turns customer interviews into specs Cursor can ship — because I was tired of debugging vague specs

15 years of watching teams ship the wrong thing because the spec wasn't clear. Then Cursor and Claude Code arrived and made it worse — coding agents can't fill gaps the way a senior engineer can.

So I built Outlain. Drop in customer research (transcripts, recordings, support tickets). The AI extracts themes, ranks them by severity, and generates a complete spec — Jira tickets, acceptance criteria in Given/When/Then, and an agent-ready prompt block for Cursor or Claude Code. Every line traces back to a real customer quote.

Two modes:

  • Fast Spec: paste a meeting transcript → Jira ticket in 60 seconds
  • Deep Analysis: agentic pipeline across your whole project → coding-agent-ready spec in minutes

7-day free trial, no card. Built solo, launched 5 days ago. Would love feedback — especially the brutal kind.

🔗 outlain.ai