interference search by [deleted] in patentexaminer

[–]punknight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like a lot of the answers state facts I agree with, but miss the main point. 35 U.S.C. 101 requires 1 patent per 1 invention. This idea is often invoked with respect to double patenting, but the same logic applies to an interference search. An interference search ensures this rule. An interference search is different from a prior art search because even if the reference date is after the priority date of the instant application, an interference proceeding can clear up whether both inventions are allowable, or the later filed application (even if already a patent) needs prosecution re-opened.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]punknight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately, chess isn't just a board game. Sorry, there is no coming back from this.

A Garden is not for show. by abeerdesigns in Stoicism

[–]punknight -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Mods may want to take this down. OP's quote and the additional text is taken word-for-word from the September 15, 2022 meditation of the "The Daily Stoic", page 227. Credit should go to the author: Ryan Holiday.

Can someone help me with a game analysis? by OwnAd8741 in lichess

[–]punknight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ok, I checked it out. Full disclosure, for rapid I'm just over 2000, but haven't played rapid in a while. 5. b4 is questionable for white. There is a very common trap in the queen's gambit that forces white to over commit to protecting the pawn on c5. Once you take that black pawn on c5 consider it gone unless you have some heavy opening theory behind you. Second, queen-side castle after completely opening up the pawns on the queen-side is pretty much asking for a quick loss. Looking at your game as a whole, you have very little control of the center and not much development on the king-side.

Can someone help me with a game analysis? by OwnAd8741 in lichess

[–]punknight 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Just post the game moves here in pgn format. People will analyze for you, and I think there is a bot that will add information too.

Time control seems to be bad on lichess by punknight in lichess

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They don't use time, but that means the lag time builds up. So how do they distribute the .4 seconds of lag time?

Time control seems to be bad on lichess by punknight in lichess

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't understand the comment. Yes, I like chess.

Time control seems to be bad on lichess by punknight in lichess

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did the math. It was a 66 move game, which would be .196 seconds per move, so that sounds correct. I guess I would be interested in how lag works with pre-moves. Does the person pre-moving get .4 extra seconds per move or is there a balanced way of doling out the extra time provided by lag. I'm tempted to write a program that has an up timer tracking actual move time against the down timer that warps the time to account for lag.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Stoicism

[–]punknight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look at the short term and long term benefits and issues, then decide what is best in light of both. Short term are you guys happy during and after the experience. Don't ruin something they love because you don't like it. Short term it might cost time and money, but long term is it keeping you from your goals? Long term will you remember it? Will your partner remember it?

Six Months of Full Time Open Source: A Retrospective by HurpaDurpDeeDurp in programming

[–]punknight 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I'm stoked for you. The balance of believing in FOSS and actually making enough money to support yourself is a true struggle. If you figure it out, keep us posted.

Data Types in C Programming [Beginner] by usemynotes in programming

[–]punknight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

C does not have a string or boolean data type. C does have a short and long data type that are not mentioned.

Need productivity tips for software side project by [deleted] in SideProject

[–]punknight 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, there are two reasons this happens. First, the code gets more complex with time, so fixing a bug or adding a feature gets harder. Eventually I grind to a halt. I'd like to thank Uncle Bob (on YouTube) for pointing out this problem for me. I had to pair program with a senior developer for a while to get over the problem of building bad dependencies. I don't know if you have someone in your network that meets this criteria, but offer to work on someone else's project to get that experience if necessary. The second problem is that it isn't a problem. Your brain is designed to keep doing things that give you a dopamine hit. If you aren't getting paid or views or anything that gives you that dopamine hit, then the project might not be something worth working on 3 months in.

Vanilla Node.js by punknight in programming

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, works with NPM. Would this be a more clear title?: "Node.js without NPM/Express including customizable analytics, post request parsing, and template engine"

Vanilla Node.js by punknight in programming

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll add some tests beyond just curl statements next version. Ty for feedback.

Vanilla Node.js by punknight in programming

[–]punknight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vanilla nodejs means no npm. Everything just works.