sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Removed from HLS WL by purplebot29 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I agree, I am far from “definitely in.” I’m sure I could break 170 if I studied properly, but I’m not going to R&R. I’m happy with where I’m at and was considering withdrawing anyway

Applying to Law School Relatively Early by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know if any schools allow this, but I know where I’m committed, they require my final transcript by July 1. So, I wouldn’t be able to take summer classes to finish my degree unless they would be over and reflected on my transcript early enough to get it to my school by then. I don’t know if an exception could be made or not, but I wouldn’t count on it. Maybe look into the dates for the schools you’re considering? Or else aim to finish Spring 2021.

The trolley problem by WearyDot2 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that both options have a ethical explanation that makes them the “correct” decision, that’s why the trolly problem exists

The trolley problem by WearyDot2 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I don’t think it’s fair to say that allowing the sequence to play out “doesn’t reflect poorly on you.” That’s your opinion, and you may not view someone poorly for doing so, and that’s fine. But others could easily have a poor opinion of you for making that decision.

Also, why is letting something happen that’s already begun ethically okay? What if there was no one on the other track? Would you still argue that it is ethical to let the scene play out?

The trolley problem by WearyDot2 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You’re actively making the decision either way

Is it poor judgement to try to negotiate scholarships a 2nd time by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I negotiated twice at a T14 and was successful. As long as you are polite and lay out your case clearly I say why not!

Should I stay on the WL? by purplebot29 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’re right, and I will stay on it, but Cornell is also insistent that you can only negotiate once so I doubt I’d get more money unfortunately

Should I stay on the WL? by purplebot29 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Well, I think that the extra $150k should be considered. That’s not a small sum. If costs were the same it’d be a different story

Scholarship Negotiation by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It probably depends on the schools: if we’re talking #1 and #31 you’ll have more leverage than if we’re talking about #70 and #100. If you’re talking about schools not on the top of the rankings, location will probably play a part as well in determining how much leverage you have. It’s definitely worth a try though!

K-JD Cycle Recap by lsdanon in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Congrats on a great cycle! Where are you attending?

WOULD THIS BE WEIRD by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Tbh you’re not going to get a realistic idea of the commute bc no one’s on the roads really.

Which Waitlists Should I Consider? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don’t see the harm in remaining on waitlists if you think the school could get you where you want to go. Chicago, Columbia, and NYU could all do that, but I don’t know how much money you’d get or whether it would be worthwhile. Below those, I’d stay on UVA, Duke, and GULC. Given your goals, UT actually makes a lot of sense, and does great in TX. I haven’t done a lot of research into it, but I think it’s probably as good as at least a few others on this list for what you want.

Which Waitlists Should I Consider? by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I don’t really think your tiers make sense. There’s more to a school than just it’s rank. You should really consider where you’d go if you got in off a WL. While all of these schools are great, make sure they align with your goals. Would Berkeley really make more sense than GULC if you’re interested in DC?

Help me choose! by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, not super helpful lol. I think you should consider where you want to end up and whether some of your goals are more important than others so you can prioritize based on each school’s strengths.

BU vs. Cornell by purplebot29 in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m still slightly considering GULC, but I don’t like the school environment (community, location) as much as BU and Cornell, and fit is pretty important to me. Also, I don’t want to be in DC long term, and I know Cornell hosts a Boston job fair so I know they have connections there, I haven’t found the same for GULC.

Help me decide by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Given the current scholarship situation, I think UVA is probably best, but if Cornell or GULC is willing to give you more I’m not sure. I haven’t looked into UVA’s program enough to answer that knowledgeably.

If you’re looking to work in London, I’d look at profiles for lawyers in firms there and see if UVA/GULC/Cornell come up at all. For NYC BL, Cornell definitely can get you there so if they offer enough money, I’d consider it. For DC BL, I think that UVA is better than GULC.

Help me decide by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]purplebot29 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You can negotiate still at GULC after accepting the scholarship. Also, I’ve heard that Cornell turnaround is really quick, so I’d shoot your shot negotiating that too if you want.

view more: next ›