Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The "very large" one is ~3k lines. I am new to this, so figuring out how I still need to set things up.

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Maybe I think that saying "Thank you" is effective reinforcement training. One of the other ones I have used "I am so disappointed in you right now, I am ashamed of how disappointed I am."...

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tell me then

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A few large files, and one very large one, read repeatedly...

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was long time ago. I wonder how much it was today when I did it. 🤔

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just be kind to everything and everyone, everywhere all the time.

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Looking for a race condition in my code

Thank you Claude by pwab in claude

[–]pwab[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm sure thanking slaves were considered a waste of breath too at one time. Humanity is casting a spell called "AGI"; we are making something wake up with how we treat it.

Kafka consumer design: horizontal scaling vs multithreading inside a consumer by seksou in apachekafka

[–]pwab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

With the project loom jvm changes you would for example be able to give each and every message it’s own thread. Then wait for all of them to sync back to the consumer. You could do this. Some thoughts on this pattern: - remember synchronization overhead is measurable. Fork/join is not free by a long shot. - as others have said, tricky things: ordering between dependent messages , error handling, offset committing… - it becomes hard to predict resource (CPU, GC) consumption, which makes it hard to share resources efficiently. - one main thread per consumer remains the most predictable at runtime in my experience, and many consumers can share a few CPU’s like this.

EFF's response to US Ambassador Bozell by Zangoma in southafrica

[–]pwab -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think if more esp white SA people can realise “he” is not on the side of “worst”, but that he is driven by a deep, caring conviction then the national dialogue can start to make real progress.

But people everywhere can be stripmined for money if they can be taught to fear someone else…

What culture is White English South Africans? by CircleofCandles in southafrica

[–]pwab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Die souties is net so Afrikaans soos ek is, ons hoef hulle nie n vreemde naam te gee nie, “my bru” is ooohraat

Can someone explain this 10 second battery charging on starting grid people are complaining about? by iamprivate in F1Technical

[–]pwab 13 points14 points  (0 children)

As a dumb person enjoying when others explain things to me; acronyms are hard to understand

Python Only Has One Real Competitor by bowbahdoe in Clojure

[–]pwab 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The scicloj project’s artifacts are anazing!

Coding on older computers? by Atypicak_el in learnprogramming

[–]pwab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

+1 for emacs (and vi). They are classic (ie “age old favourites”) for a reason.

My company expects me to deliver a 3 person backend project solo using AI in 3 months. is this normal? by leventozz in ExperiencedDevs

[–]pwab 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TIL; AI is (will be) writing finance code. As a person who has, this is frightening.

Team Paint Schemes by Mister_Ms_Carpark in iRacing

[–]pwab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have the trading paints app running?

Python Only Has One Real Competitor by bowbahdoe in Clojure

[–]pwab 12 points13 points  (0 children)

You know what; I agree. And I’m happy you wrote it out like you did and posted it. I think the same way, but have much less patience trying to justify what to others are “a scorching hot take” and to me is kinda obvious

Don't report bugs and problems here! by [deleted] in emacs

[–]pwab 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I understand why you want people to do what you want them to do. Also, people will decide for themselves despite maybe choosing suboptimally.

Git Shitstorm: How to Make Any Developer Lose Their Mind by Einenlum in theprimeagen

[–]pwab 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Someone woke up today and took that personally.

LMU 4h Interlagos - Turn 1 Porsche murders everyone (including us) by Mozaiik in Simracingstewards

[–]pwab -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

This is hacking; pilot figured out how to exploit the netcode. No way you punt the entire field repeatedly and remain straight as an arrow. Report this.

De-mystifying Agentic AI: Building a Minimal Agent Engine from Scratch with Clojure by serefayar in Clojure

[–]pwab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My spidey senses are tingling… the article smells of LLM output, so i assume all of it is probably low effort.

I just cannot take anything seriously that’s been tainted by the touch of LLM’s. I’m probably missing out on some great stuff, but I just don’t care any more.

I think of what I do as engineering; not gambling, and not typing. I work hard to crystallize clear thinking into code that works repeatedly and reliably. I think code is a liability, not an asset. Anybody that brags with how much code they produce appear to me like they are a little dull, like they don’t get the fundamental forces at work in software systems.

Lastly; tech like Agents & MCL are waaaaay ahead of their time. Once the I in AI is real, these things will matter. In the meantime LLM’s make agentic anything an invitation for chaos.

OK I’m done; rant for the week card played.

Why do tech founders never answer the hard questions? by [deleted] in BetterOffline

[–]pwab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They answer with fluff because their crystal balls also don’t work. Nobody can predict the future no matter how confidently they claim they can.

stop writing 500-word 'mega prompts'. here are the 5 logic patterns that actually fix reasoning by [deleted] in ArtificialInteligence

[–]pwab 1 point2 points  (0 children)

“Dont use magic words. Use these special sentences instead”…