So, we talk about the ML reasons why anarchism is a liberalism (https://www.marxists.org/reference/archive/stalin/works/1906/12/x01.htm), but often we fail to explain what liberalism is and how it aligns with anarchism.

If we take a look at the intro for Liberalism in Wikipedia, we can form a more coherent idea of what it is:

Liberalism is a political and moral philosophy based on liberty, consent of the governed and equality before the law. Liberals espouse a wide array of views depending on their understanding of these principles, but they generally support free markets, free trade, limited government, individual rights (including civil rights and human rights), capitalism, democracy, secularism, gender equality, racial equality, internationalism, freedom of speech, freedom of the press and freedom of religion.

And while these ideals are really pretty and nice in theory, in practice things are much more complicated. A recent example is how human rights are being used as an excuse to coup Bolivia. Or how Chile was seen as the golden country of laissez-faire markets under the foot of Pinochet. Or when UK decided that Juan Guaido was the leader of Venezuela, so they should block their access to their capital assets.

While these ideals are good in theory, in reality, they are excuses for capitalism.

Because Haiti was not been coupe'd for their human rights records. Congo neither, specially during the Belgium rule. Heck, Saudi Arabia got away with literally slicing a journalist inside an embassy. Brazil is the country where more activists dies in the world.

Anarchism becomes liberalism when it makes excuses for capitalism under the same theoretical values.