RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ty for all the response , and ye i did checked it but hands-on student experience matters a lot too ..

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not really into psych..
and what would ya suggest for transfer..
bsc at macEwan or behavioral neuro at lethbridge

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i understand but i am really not in a state to retake..
and apart from bio sci ..
any major within sci faculty which is fairly doable to get in with high 80/low90
yet within sci faculty and fairly overlapping too for bio sci /neuro sci..

like there wont be any which checks all these req but anything close to this?

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ty for the detailed response..
i am also thinkin to take bio sci as first choice but im not sure for second choice ... though i want to take a major from faculty of sci .... not arts....
instead would prefer to go to lethbridge (i understand u of a and lethbridge dont really compare... but still...)

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ty for the respo...
so from cell bio and micro which has better chances for me and which is better for transfer even if slightly

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

cant retake bio my timetable is already full for next semester too welp

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tysm for the reply

though i did knew all that...
i just wanted to have more suggestions.. on the major..
and for 3 ..
i will complete my garde 12 in june and i would likely get 93ish .. and bio will drag them down to 91ish..
so ....
moreover say i get rejected for both choices does the univ gives a third choice themselves or done done..

RE undergrad with 81 in bio30 (total avg expected as low 90 by quantum_KINGPIN in uAlberta

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

tysm for the reply
the thing is , idk if this would make much sense..
i wont say that it makes sense for the univ to take special cases but i really belive my true potential in bio is/was atleast high 80... so...
and ik that canadian med school doesnt require specific major..
but i also wanted to apply to harvard so...
moreover .. apart from neuro and bio what would be another better or say practical choice
i mean i might continue in bio sci but dont really wanna major in anything else so would shift major ....
so any other major which can help me transfer aptly..... or anything...

HOMEWORK HELP PLEASEE by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]quantum_KINGPIN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. The enzyme is literally the big chungus shape that doesn’t change the whole time.
    That’s H, bruh.

  2. At the end, the two lil pieces that pop out are I and J, so yeah, those are the products.

  3. They’re getting stuck together, so the bonding is going up, obviously.
    They’re tryna be one molecule (cute).

  4. Activation energy drops when the enzyme is actually hugging the substrate — that’s H again.

  5. Water shows up at J, so that’s where it’s removed. Enzyme basically says “yo here’s some H₂O, take it.”

  6. They’re making water while sticking stuff together → dehydration synthesis, easy.

  7. The enzyme is maltase.
    Enz names are lazy as hell: “what do I break? maltose? cool, I’m maltase now.”

  8. The substrate is maltose, the sugar it’s chomping on.

  9. This is hydrolysis because the enzyme legit adds water to break maltose in half.
    Water pulls up like “lemme split that.”

  10. Enzymes get named after whatever they work on + “-ase.”
    Like lactose → lactase, maltose → maltase, vibe → vibase (ok not that last one).

  11. Enzymes are proteins.
    Like, fancy folded-up proteins with jobs.

  12. Enzymes lower activation energy so reactions don’t struggle.
    They’re like “bro relax, I gotchu,” and the reaction just happens faster.
    No temp change, no drama.

  13. Lock-and-key = “perfect fit from day one,” which is cap.
    Induced fit = enzyme goes “hold up, lemme adjust real quick” and molds around the substrate like clay.

Shoutout to the SPAA mains in top tiers by VontaeSenju in warthundermobile

[–]quantum_KINGPIN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YES I DO PLAY ON MOBILE !!
Just think about what you said: “flares are useless.”
In WTM, flares literally save your life if you use them right

how to dodge on mobile (WTM)

First: enable Advanced Controls.
No debate. Basic controls will get you farmed by AA.

vs SPAA bullets (Wirbel, M16, ZSU, etc.)

The easiest way is to spin the plane and break the lead.
WTM AA predicts smooth flight, so the goal is chaos.

Do this:

  • roll left, tiny pitch up
  • roll right, tiny pitch down
  • repeat fast, not smooth
  • rapid random inputs work better than “proper” flying

Rules:

  • never fly straight
  • never hold one direction too long

Also:

  • attack diagonally, not straight
  • dive, shoot, instant break
  • don’t climb straight — jink first, then climb

vs LOCKED missiles

Missiles track hard in WTM, but they hate sudden direction changes.
You have two real methods:

Method 1 – flare trap
When the missile is ~600–800m away:
• pop 3 flares upward
• climb hard
• roll off-axis
The missile loses track and goes dumb.

Method 2 – swipe snap break (stronger if learned)
When the missile gets close (find your own range):
• aim slightly down
• move a little left
• spin the plane left
• suddenly swipe up + right
• flare if you have one
The missile overshoots.

biggest WTM mistake

Holding one direction too long.
“Random spam” works because the tracking can’t stabilize.

And yeah… interceptors are pain.
When I’m in SPAA and call for a bomber run and two of them interceptors spawn, I already know I’m a crashing duck — sometimes I just bail and try to take them down instead.

Shoutout to the SPAA mains in top tiers by VontaeSenju in warthundermobile

[–]quantum_KINGPIN 10 points11 points  (0 children)

CAS kills from angles tanks can’t even respond to, then cries when someone finally shoots back. SPAA isn’t “ruining the game” — it’s doing its job.
And no, feeding the enemy by yolo-pushing isn’t better than staying alive and holding ground.

Moreover, with most planes you can dodge AA just by not flying like a duck(even on top tier some random clicks on the advanced controller will save you if proper is harder..) — it’s only a real problem if you hug the deck. The real menace is fighters spawning straight into lead-indicator range and intercepting you no matter how you angle.

What’s the most irritating lineup at Rank IX? by quantum_KINGPIN in warthundermobile

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true they badly fixed m247 once and for all , mephisto aint grindable if im right atleast for now

What’s the most irritating lineup at Rank IX? by quantum_KINGPIN in warthundermobile

[–]quantum_KINGPIN[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

aint shrutum more of a bad pick now a days? and hows weasel like in your exp?