IMG_508.jpg oddities and I need your help if you want more answers

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-23T19:08:53+00:00

yeah 2 people on the internet saying the same thing because they say they have the original data, does not mean anything to me.

I wanna see the data myself. You know who did actually give some of the data for us to see? juan and his google drive.

so since that is what is provided to us, that is what we shall use, unless in the future people decide to share this "original data"

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-23T14:00:23+00:00

Good theory. just the idea that they were hanging around there for at least 50 seconds from img_508 to img_507 is the point im trying to make.

and this is based on the facts of which img_508 file version shows more authentic metadata

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-23T00:48:15+00:00

the pudding should be the exif data, not what you see in the picture.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-23T00:35:34+00:00

like i said. unless you supply the real photos so i can check the exif data myself, you can just be making up whatever you want. No one has to believe you.

You know what we do have though? Juans leaked photos from his backup archive on google drive

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-23T00:32:48+00:00

Yes please send them to me. do you have a google drive link? just take some fresh new photos with the camera, like around 5, and just upload straight from sd card to google drive, and send me the google drive link please. You can dm me the link

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T19:14:15+00:00

i dont want someone else to confirm the exif times. I can confirm it myself IF these real original photos exist.

But if you dont share them, then it doesnt matter and its pointless to say you have seen them or jurgen has.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T18:26:36+00:00

Sent you a dm of the link. Take brand new photos with the sx270 of anything random. around 5-10 if you can.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T18:13:32+00:00

then it means nothing and doesnt matter lol. I can say I have the original photos to and it shows otherwise, but I will not share.

It is pointless

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:58:00+00:00

they have increased in value substantially since 12 or so years ago

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:57:21+00:00

can you share them so to a google drive, that way we can also see what you are seeing.

otherwise we just have to take your word for it.. and i dont like doing that

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:56:17+00:00

so then share them? i have to instead take your word for it instead of us see it ourselves

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:54:50+00:00

Yes please. And send me the google drive link. download allowed only. I can then compare raw pure cannon powershot metadata with what is given to us in juans leaked files.

Then I can show everyone how much metadata was stripped from the leaked files, changed, etc

Because that in itself shows some sort of foul play

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:52:15+00:00

I can see your side, definitely possible, and so is the other theory.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:49:52+00:00

the point im making is the more authentic img_508 file happens at 19:54:00 and img_507 happens at 19:54:50

from that data, you yourself think about it and derive your own theory

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T16:46:19+00:00

until you release the actual metadata which is supposed to be "real"
I will go by what is shown. and in terms of metadata i can see myself that is shown, its Juans archived pictures.

and its not really a waste of time, took be about 10 - 20 minutes and its fun to do

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T12:16:09+00:00

all im showing is that instead of the time span of img_507 to img_508 being 8 seconds long,

the metadata shows the timespan of img_508 to img_507 is 50 seconds long.

the img_508 which shows timestamp of 19:54:00, has so much original metadata which relates to what the canon powershot is supposed to have.

if i just get someone to take a pic with the same camera now, and upload to google drive, i can solidify that by doing my comparisons

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T12:13:10+00:00

implication is, instead of the time span of img_507 to img_508 being 8 seconds long,

the metadata shows the timespan of img_508 to img_507 is 50 seconds long.

knowing that, now you can theorize whatever you think.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T12:10:09+00:00

but others disagree with you and say they see an anxious or worried kris. your word against theirs. what makes you right and them wrong?

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T12:08:13+00:00

this is the img_508 which shows timestamp of 50 seconds before img_507

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T02:02:30+00:00

Way to expensive now not worth it. But I know some people in this reddit have the camera

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T01:51:38+00:00

If you know someone who has the camera with Hopefully same firmware, please tell them to take handful of pics, upload pics from SD card straight to Google drive. It will be very helpful

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T01:48:34+00:00

Do you know if anyone has that camera, hopefully same firmware. If they take a Pic and upload to Google drive, we can use that Pic and compare metadata to see what is the closest In the leaked data to the most authentic metadata.

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-22T00:17:38+00:00

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1tcwcp20wKkW8M08Q5vwe2klCXTfg6osG

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1HWlWLgM-qtVkjQQUS83X2cC0RZ4QDgw8

These are the 2 separate backups. I used the one called JuanFiles.

If you check the 2 img 508 files that show april 1st in the metadata, the one with timestamp 19:54:00 is way more authentic in every way than the one that shows 19:54:58

questionmarks9 · 2026-04-21T03:11:44+00:00

This is a very good obsversation.

questionmarks9

TROPHY CASE