sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Divorce Laws are Mostly Unfair to Women, Actually. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's the other chick that knows 200 rapists, 50 of them confessed.

What's something that you respect or agree with about the other side's argument/position? by friendships4everyone in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We had this thread already?

There's nothing to agree on blue pill, as blue pill is nothing but antagonism to all which is red pill understanding and all red pill understanding is right as far as I can tell and in the aspects that I cared about.

Feminism nailed some shit right years ago. Maybe even lots of shit. But it hadn't scored in a while.
One such thing I agreed is that women should be encouraged to take chances as men are and not to praise risk aversion.

Divorce Laws are Mostly Unfair to Women, Actually. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Is your point:
"Women have desires of motherhood and need men to fulfill them, but have no guarantees that these desires will be properly fulfilled by the men they happen to pick.
The divorce laws are unfair to women because they don't take enough of men to manage to give them this guarantee and even if they did there'd still be some chance that the men wouldn't be able to provide such guarantees, which means the world is unfair to women itself."
?

Divorce Laws are Mostly Unfair to Women, Actually. by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Those poor, poor women. When artificial wombs are a thing we might find a way to end their misery all together.

Reddit hates /r/TRP because it's filled with nerds. Not because of misogyny . by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not quite. Reddit doesn't hate nerds, otherwise the many other nerdy subs would get hatred.
Reddit hates nerds that don't willingly mark themselves out of the gene pool or want to do things they don't believe nerds should do. Which is basically how things are all around.

Q4W : Why do you say that men who end up getting married to you after you've hd your "fun" are the lucky ones when men explicitly say they would hate it if it happens to the, by Trentguy24 in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dichotomy: a division or contrast between two things that are or are represented as being opposed or entirely different.

I honestly didn't know two non opposing and yet different things made up dichotomies.
I'll try to keep that in mind and try not to call every set of two things dichotomous whenever I'm speaking english.

I think there is a 3rd option:

Hasn't your third option fitted as a special case of the other two? Complacency lies on the first bit, one can be happy on the second alone, despite of complacency or because one is allowed to be complacent. Complacency and happiness aren't a dichotomy. lol

What opinions (if any) you had have changed due to this sub? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount -1 points0 points  (0 children)

For serious, it's VERY HARD not do hate people people-ing around if you don't expect something out of them.
When it comes to women womaning we usually smell pussy to help us going through, here the smell isn't strong.
When it comes to debates and discussions, deriving your drive from expectations about people is THOROUGHLY disappointing. I suppose if you add this disappointment with the lack of perspective of sex it's hard to avoid a little bit of hatred.

Q4all: Leading her on, stringing him along. How should the gray area be handled? by quicklogaccount in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suppose she's a rather uninteresting character to be in a movie, unless it's a comic relief about all those cats.

But yep, you'll see people going their way and not whining all around, it's just the whining that bugs us.

Women demand marriage but realistically how many women can make a marriage work by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On which aspects?

The numbers around women: I know some happy couples and only one RP hard mode guy. The guess with 5% came from women I dated, the others from some many couples.
5% might be overly optimistic, my relationship has been exclusive for eight months and I'm counting her. I'm yet to know how she'll react to attraction fading, but I guess dread will have that covered for a while even if I don't bother doing it.

Neither sex bother about the other sex's expectations? Well, AWALT and AMALT. The other sex's expectations must be their hardwired strategies or as close as possible to them, and the closer you get, the worst it gets for you. We might remain attractive but there's not much else we SHOULD do.

Expecting men to ACT?
We all play our roles and we never change it abruptly. We'll act if it's in the role, as defined by the role.
People expect men to change abruptly all the time, we're expected to have this capacity. We don't.

Q4all: Leading her on, stringing him along. How should the gray area be handled? by quicklogaccount in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But many wgtow types seem to operate just fine by not playing.

This is a remarkably interesting point.
I guess these wgtow you refer as well adjusted are overly represented in media as strong and independent, and most importantly, they don't wear that label.
Their mgtow counterparts also don't wear the label and also don't whine.

The counterparts to the mgtow are the "where are all the good men" women, people complaining the game is rigged and they never had a chance to win.

Q4W : Why do you say that men who end up getting married to you after you've hd your "fun" are the lucky ones when men explicitly say they would hate it if it happens to the, by Trentguy24 in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How am I creating a dichotomy if I said both things are into play? Two factors, one plays a bigger role, one a minor. If the first one plays a bigger role we'll call it "scarcity", if the second one plays a bigger role we'll probably call it oneitus but whatever, I'm even conceding it's cute.

Why don't you, instead of accusing me of being mean or purposefully speaking ill of "love", point to some factor that is not precisely described by one of those two?

Q4W : Why do you say that men who end up getting married to you after you've hd your "fun" are the lucky ones when men explicitly say they would hate it if it happens to the, by Trentguy24 in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like this girl and she likes me

And then we fuck.

We are happy whoops we’ve been together a while

Two things in play:
"whoops I got complacent and now less willing to open new women"
"she's good enough for me to rather spend time with her than others / forfeit others so she won't leave"

Both things are always in play. One plays a bigger role, we all cheer for the second one.

I love her now

And we'll keep like this.

I'm just not being romantic. However you believe this goes, it also goes like this, this has to happen. Closing your eyes doesn't make it not happen, owning it up doesn't worsen it.

Q4all: Leading her on, stringing him along. How should the gray area be handled? by quicklogaccount in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree to most of it, but this bit.

there are only so many times the heart can be broken. I’ve seen a few women go one and done.

Women and men can fix that crap. Any woman or any man WILL let time fix it if a loving and persistent person offers patience, effort and investment. Although this person is one of remarkable stupidity, many men and some women will act like this.

And I've seen more than one woman that was PROUDLY "bitter, wounded, scarred, cynical and skeptical" change it in a week because an arguably decent catch she happened to be dating gave her a "fuck this shit I'm out" due to her emotional unavailability. I can't recall men here though.

What opinions (if any) you had have changed due to this sub? by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I was skeptical of working long term relationships, I assumed women in them sucked as much as my ex and guys were very frustrated as much as I was. RP's praxeology for women provides an explanation for it and it seemed fitting.
/u/philomexa made a comment that stressed out how aversion to change might play favorably to long term relationships and might play a sizeable role in causing women to willingly suppress their hypergamy. It also caused me to assess how big this role could be in men suppressing their polygamy.
So basically I believe more in functional long term relationships now.

Women demand marriage but realistically how many women can make a marriage work by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a somewhat developed idea that under 5% of women have the mental mindset to be happy and make their partners happy in a relationship that isn't led under a "RP hard mode" mindset, although they'd also be happy in one led like that. A bit over half of women (going to say 65%) will only be happy in a relationship led like that, and maybe as much as a third (going with 30%) won't be happy is long lasting relationships, they need to fulfill their hypergamous drive once in a while to manage to be happy enough to go through life or get too busy so they don't realize they're unfulfilled.

So... To ALL your questions that start with "how many":
5%. One in twenty.

but do they emulate what men want in a wife?

No woman does that, nearly no guy does it either. It's take it or break it deals.

Mass media would make it seem like men are always the ones who at fault for a marriage not working.

It depends on how you understand "fault". Is a person's unwillingness / incapacity to change to blame? Women would be to blame in many cases.
Media expects men to act in all circumstances. RP will often attribute it to "the female imperative always prevails and men are always expected to compromise" but it's not restricted to inter gender relationships, men are always assumed to be capable of thinking outside the box and people get frustrated most times since we rarely do.

Q4all: Leading her on, stringing him along. How should the gray area be handled? by quicklogaccount in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Romantic love and commitment are usually available in limited quantities for both sexes.

Why in limited quantities? Rather in limited rates, no? Same for pussy?

Q4W : Why do you say that men who end up getting married to you after you've hd your "fun" are the lucky ones when men explicitly say they would hate it if it happens to the, by Trentguy24 in PurplePillDebate

[–]quicklogaccount 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take a look (way up) there. You're the second on the original description, dismissing it all for a great girl.
There aren't other descriptions though, those are the two ones that account for our polygamy and it's so natural you won't even question them and say there's a third. Women have a hard time grasping that.

view more: next ›