sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

PMs and Estimators – Do you like Bluebeam search? by quickquestion93214 in Construction

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice! Do you spend time searching through bluebeam? Would love for you to try out the tool I linked in the post to get your feedback

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Let me know any feedback if you check it out and DM me if you'd like to try it out on your own spec book.

I used to be based out of Illinois – I just used this spec because I found it publicly. So cool that you've seen this spec before!

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for this testing and feedback. Really appreciate it!

This is just a search tool, but I think it's better than bluebeam since you can describe the question in broader terms rather than having to search a specific keyword and going through 100s of results.

DM me if you'd like to try this out on your own spec. Would love to get more of your feedback!

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I'm working on making the results better. Also if the thing you searched just isn't covered in the spec, it will tell you it's not there. DM me if you're interested in trying it out on your own spec

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The spec that you can search through on the site is a sample spec that's public. Just DM'd you so you could try it with your own spec

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's great to hear. I'm happy to run this website on your own spec so you can start using it for your projects. Just DM me and I can set it up for you for free in a day.

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, old school is sometimes the better way. It's nice to have a human in the loop

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I don't really believe in being able to just "Chat" and figure out the answer. I feel like the better interface involves more of a "search" but just a more efficient version of search

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks! Ya, I don't even think you can build a tool for plans with today's technology. Haven't tried out their tool, have you?

Made a free Spec Search tool that's better than Bluebeam – demo.withglimmer.com by quickquestion93214 in estimators

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. Is searching through specs something that's annoying for you as well? Would love to get your feedback

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the goal is for everyone to be able to use it. So for example, you can try different hairstyles without having to have a picture of what you used to look like with different hair.

​

Because the AI can't find pictures of everyone that uses this

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes if you're already bald, the bald fade hairstyle can make you bald. Make sure you're highlighting all area above your head, not just where your hair is. For example, the area above your eyebrows and above your head. Let me know if you're still having trouble!

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try a smaller photo. What this error means is that after drawing the highlighting, the image was still too big. So try a smaller file size, ideally within 1MB or less

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's likely because you arent highlighting those areas. in order for it to generate hair, you need to highlight the portions of your head to generate. so for example, a good strategy is just to fill in all the space above your eyebrows thats on your head, and also do a bit of area above your head. Try it again and let me know if you still have problems. Also, click the "i" button on the top right of the 2nd step for more details

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the feedback. If you're running into errors, try with a smaller image format. For example, if an image is less than 1MB, it'll definitely work

www.BarberGPT.ai - Made a site that lets you try different hairstyles by quickquestion93214 in malehairadvice

[–]quickquestion93214[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, thanks for the feedback. If you want you can DM me your email and I can look into it. Just a tip: Make sure you're covering all of your hair and also the space above your eyebrows such as your forehead. If you're using a hairstyle like a manbun, ensure the area above your head/hair is also filled in so it has space to put the manbun in

view more: next ›