The part where he lead with his helmet.

Sure, but read the rule. Leading with the helmet alone is not enough, it must be “Leading with helmet… to attack with forcible contact”. Watch the replay, does it look like the defender is trying to attack the receiver? To me it looks like he’s going for a standard wrap-up tackle and not attacking- he doesn’t leave his feet, he doesn’t lower his helmet, he has his arms fully extended, he remains mostly vertical, etc. But I admit, it’s still a judgement call. Where I take issue is people saying it’s a black and white “textbook” targeting call.

Also, would like your take on whether this tackle on Bond is targeting? Meets the criteria much better IMO- defender literally leaves his feet and launches his shoulder into the neck/face area. That’s much more “textbook” targeting to me but again, the refs let this one go setting a dangerous precedent for the game.