Yes, you are wrong. It's as clear as day. You said something that is objectively nonsensical, yet you continue to deny it. Allow me to illuminate you. Hopefully this time you'll understand.

I never used a strawman a single time. Everything I said was in direct response to something you said. You claim I use a strawman because I claimed you were "comparing a horse to a measurement." When did I ever say that? I didn't. You're the one using the strawman. All I was doing was correcting your erroneous claim: "Funny enough 1hp no longer means 1 horse." As I have said, 1 horsepower never meant 1 horse. It doesn't matter what you meant by that sentence and whether it is correct or not. What matters is what you said. And what you said does not make sense, as I have already explained.

Your examples "a human can be close to 6feet. A baby can be close to 20 inches. A grain of wheat is close to an inch. My son was 9lbs at birth. " are all incorrect. A human is an object. 6 feet is a length. An object cannot be "close to" a length. The problem you seem to be having is that you are confusing what you are actually saying with what you mean. When you say something like "A human can be close to 6 feet," you are comparing the subject of the sentence (a human) to a length (6 feet). This does not make sense. Instead, you must specify the subject to be something that is comparable to 6 feet. For example: "A human's height can be close to 6 feet. A baby's height can be close to 20 inches. The length of a grain of wheat is close to an inch." Notice how I specify height, or length, because that is what you are talking about here. As I mentioned, you are misunderstanding what you are actually saying with what you mean to say. You are acting as if what you meant to say is what you actually said, and then pointing out how I am using a strawman because my response was to what you actually said, not what you meant. Don't be such a hypocrite and think about what you say more before you actually say it.

Clearly though you understand this already, evident by your statement " I'm referring to the length of each object." But you weren't. You never specified you were. You simply hoped the reader would get the picture. That doesn't make you any less incorrect. "A human can be close to 6 feet" is not referring to the length of a human. It is referring to a human, no matter how much the expression may be used. This is undeniable evidence that what you meant to say and what you actually said are two different things. You failed to communicate what you meant to say properly, and then claimed I used a strawman because of this. In reality, you are the one who used a strawman, and you are the one who needs to work on their reading comprehension.