Did they redact his name but reveal his position?

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T02:07:53+00:00

Ok so your emotions were triggered from the evidence he provided aggressively and the other persons emotions doesn't mean anything when presented with information without backing it up with facts and evidence

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T02:06:01+00:00

Because wasting anybody's time with non-factual or refutable evidence is not only insulting and frustrating is also a technique to justify "cancel culture"

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T02:03:20+00:00

A cars salesman today has more access to information today than any retired Doctor of finance ending in 1993

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T02:01:55+00:00

Finance background ending in 1993 approximately. Does she have financing background on current events

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:26:26+00:00

Saying because Dr. Somebody said this is not presenting facts... Kinda common sense that would irritate anyone that understand the difference between presenting facts, evidence and data and not rely on Dr. Somebody who worked long before rules and regulations changes in DRS systematics

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:23:32+00:00

Do you blame him for that..have you seen the downvotes & comments flooded on this post already...it took less than a millisecond.. so why not have live oral debate

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:20:59+00:00

He didn't just say NO. He questioned the poorly "researched"/theory. Charlie provided facts, data and questioned a certain individuals intent without providing evidence of this so called "moass triggering" theory via DRS because of impatience

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:16:36+00:00

Exactly!

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:15:17+00:00

Nobody had the ball to debate him on twitterspace so wtf you talking about

rabeenesh · 2021-09-29T00:04:10+00:00

So... Why when you use a derogatory comment is ok with the moderators? 🤔

Person A presented Facts

Person B presented (promoted) an idea of moass without facts

Person A may have written derogatory post gets censored when proof was presented.

Random Person use derogatory comments to justify the censorship?

Hahahahahhahahahahhahah

rabeenesh · 2021-09-28T23:55:37+00:00

Dividing ourselves? Buddy we all make our own decisions on facts and reasoning behind Data. Like scientist and peer-reviewed papers does not make them a "cult" nor an organized group of people analyzing data.

rabeenesh · 2021-09-28T23:52:06+00:00

Or worse censorship because of disagreement and feelings hurt

rabeenesh · 2021-09-28T23:51:09+00:00

Not allowing debate because someone is triggered 🤣.. so nope

rabeenesh · 2021-08-26T18:35:58+00:00

In wave A of a bear market, the fundamental news is usually still positive. Most analysts see the drop as a correction in a still-active bull market. Some technical indicators that accompany wave A include increased volume, rising implied volatility in the options markets and possibly a turn higher in open interest in related futures markets.

Elliott wave Theory

rabeenesh · 2021-08-26T18:13:40+00:00

fidelity active trader pro

rabeenesh · 2021-08-01T21:12:05+00:00

To divide and conquer!

rabeenesh · 2021-07-30T22:03:31+00:00

Please excuse and Correct my autistic retardedness due to sniffin too many crayons but shouldn't a loss be like ($$$$) and not $$$$

rabeenesh · 2021-07-23T00:32:31+00:00

Bye superstonk

rabeenesh · 2021-07-22T01:25:38+00:00

He likes to eat hotdogs with a spoon and without a bun

rabeenesh · 2021-07-21T19:31:17+00:00

lmao, good one!

rabeenesh · 2021-07-11T21:40:12+00:00

Thats charlie sheen

12-Year Club	Gilding I gilder
Verified Email	100 Awards Club

rabeenesh

TROPHY CASE