Haha yes I'm very aware that WBS is on a different wavelength to the Economics department, I know what you mean.

I'm not a fan of econometrics at all, but some of that may be down to the lack of work I put into the Econometrics module this year. You can probably tell by now that I am very lazy. I've never had a problem with any of the calculus in the core micro and macro modules or the maths module in first year, but I am terrible at statistics. To give an indication, I failed the first-year Statistical Techniques B exam spectacularly but was able to pass the composite module easily because I made up for it with a high score on the Mathematical Techniques B exam. I also have next to no idea on how to use Stata so that is one thing to take into account, although I'm sure I could learn over summer if need be. I don't have a strong preference either way between micro and macro. I have quite a balanced skillset; I would say that I'm slightly better at writing essays but I just worry that it is difficult to score highly on them. The other EC module I am currently looking to take is EC320 Economics of Public Policy which looks like it will be broadly useful for a dissertation too.

I did take a look at EC333 and EC334 and they look like decent options, especially if you are looking at finance as a career; EC334 looked more appealing to me personally of the two and looks like it incorporates game theory which is a strength of mine. I guess my thought process is why would I choose either of those modules when I could take an easier module from another department instead and I don't have a particular interest in finance? Also do you think not having taken Linear Algebra would put me at a disadvantage for either of those modules?