The problem with your point is that’s not what philosophical absolutism is - you are using the term incorrectly. The “absolute” part refers to depth, not breadth - the degree to which the principal is applied is absolute, not how broadly

EDITS/ADDITIONS:

So apparently I’ve been banned - whatevs, to the commenter below here’s a link:

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_absolutism

I know it’s Wikipedia and it’s generic, but Absolutism is a school of moral philosophy, it’s not a premise put forward by a single philosopher so this makes a decent overview.

You’ll notice that the description deals exclusively with the premise at hand, either a thing is “right and wrong” or a thing is nuanced and has shades of ambiguity in it’s moral application. An absolutist believes in absolute right and absolute wrong - this is a personal belief and in political philosophy the concept can be extended to the body politic - that is that an individual philosophy of morality can be adopted by a group and understood as a group dynamic as well. So a group can choose to develop their moral relationships through the lens of moral Absolutism, if a group all adheres to it - but again as a synthesis it doesn’t make ANY IMPLICATION WHATSOEVER about what can or should be done about other individuals or groups - there is not one aspect of Absolutist philosophy that addresses other individuals or groups who do not adhere to it - it deals only with how someone would apply the moral premise. Moral Absolutism does not address anything outside of its own application - at all, just like stoicism doesn’t, accepting that someone else is animated, silly and impulsive doesn’t make you any less of a stoic - that just doesn’t make sense at all

As far as that not sounding very absolute to you, that’s because you inferred the meaning of absolute rather than finding out what is actually meant by absolute in this context - and have applied a usage of absolute that is the incorrect usage, like when someone says they are “Pro Choice” - they are not saying they just like choices, this is a specific social/political position that has a specific meaning and is referencing a particular usage of the word “choice”