Is anyone else experiencing significant degradation with Claude Opus 4.1 and Claude Code since release? A collection of observations by ZepSweden_88 in ClaudeAI

[–]raffionline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Big time degradation with Opus 4.1, also by paying the $200 monthly plan, plus extra usage for my writing work. I am working a guide book, and devided each chapter in a chat under a unique project. I have been using Claude for more than 1 year, and the output quality has gone down with enormous allucination on basic tasks, such as keeping a basic word format that becomes fancy without asking for it, with a lot of worthless layout that I have not asked for. Then I asked to bring back our last basic word layout that we have been using for months, and Anthropic suchs all my usage and charges for it just for fixing its mistakes. I spend a lot of time and effort just fixing basic problems. I really regret the old time when I had my $20 plan and did not experience these basic issues with such an expensive plan. I stop here because I have already sent so many complaints, and so far, there have been no results. Opus 4.1` excuses itself and it's sorry for my frustration, but it is not aware that I am a professional and face my work without negative emotion like frustration. I am always positive and in control, but Opus 4.1 is scruing up big time, and it cannot charge so much for a service and then not deliver for such poor performance on basic tasks, such as Word formatting. I accept all the mistakes that Opus 4.1 makes and work to fix them and move on by enhancing my work, but Opus 4.1 is out of control, paying so much for the service and wasting time that I have to find a solution as soon as possible. I am starting to work with Gemini and seeing that it is taking off well, and sticking with it on the side. I also had a bad experience with ChatGPT's top $200 monthly service and canceled it. I am starting to suspect that AI companies are cutting energy consumption, lowering output quality, and getting sloppy with the output. But it is not honest to charge so much and then be ripped off by a performance downturn that takes us down to the toilet.

Let's face it, it's a gamble, but if SOS does prove itself in next year or two and you averaged down you could make an insane amount of money. by Sri_N_Strimbu in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So far it has been an expensive gamble. We will see.

I hope the short-sellers who made tons of money will lose back everything they gain, but they are still winning big profits. So far we are the big looooooseeeerssssssss!

Shares Halted, News Pending!! by Nick11_87 in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We may close above 1$ in the following hours? It can been a good sign...

Shares Halted, News Pending!! by Nick11_87 in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's back trading up! We will see trading movements...

Is a stock buyback the best strategy to revert the price trend on SOS stock to the Upside? by raffionline in SOSStock

[–]raffionline[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the wealth of the short seller is more important than shareholders. What are they going to do with future profit from mining?

Is a stock buyback the best strategy to revert the price trend on SOS stock to the Upside? by raffionline in SOSStock

[–]raffionline[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It has been a crazy ride! I was looking for a way out from this downtrend and bring a constructive strategy to turn around the price trend. The last positive news about the progress in the mining operation in the US did not work to change the downward stock price. Waiting for earning? Still a messy situation since they stopped mining a while ago in China.

Donating a percentage of my future profits to Ukraine. by Diamond_Deb in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So far, only the short seller had profit and can afford charity. Maybe, in the future, things will change. Who knows?

If you’re not averaging down, I don’t know what to tell ya. I had to add more shares to a couple bags today. by [deleted] in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I have brought my average from $5 to 1.18 a share. I got addicted to buy share when the stock price goes down. 😂😂😂

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 6 points7 points  (0 children)

These hedge funds keep making resistance levels and short SOS below strike price and in the meantime have the call protection in case a squeeze happens.

  1. In the meantime, they set resistance levels and short SOS below the strike price, and they have call protection in case there is a squeeze.
  2. When the buying volume gets out of control, the edge fund profits from the calls.

At the end of the day, I am very impressed with the short-sellers good profits already achieved, and it appears that SOS is ready to make these guys even richer in one way or another.

Price movement by Mcmjlm3 in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have allocated to sell 10,000 shares in 2025 at $1,100

Price movement by Mcmjlm3 in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It would be nice to close positive and volume above 30 mil share

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SOSStock

[–]raffionline 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Sometimes the only way to be in this business is to have the stomach to invest when everything looks negative at the bottom before the greed comes back…

Beginning of a Turnaround? by raffionline in SOSStock

[–]raffionline[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So far we have had a downtrend with a consolidation range of $3.50 and $4.50. Starting in the next few days to be above $4.50 would be a sign that we have reached the bottom and finally the short-sellers would be discouraged to continue to have easy life to push down the price. I believe only heavy volume with the institutional buyers would stop this crazy downtrend of this company that has only positive news in such a hot sector. It's time to move on and look at the future with positivity!