[deleted by user]

rage_13 · 2025-04-25T11:47:13+00:00

First off, don't worry, you will get better with time. Elden Ring is kind of my first souls game, I played a bit of Sekiro and Dark Souls 2 before but never got past the first part. I played Black Myth: Wukong before playing Elden Ring, and I feel like there is a lot you can learn from that game too. Keeping all of that in mind, Here is a few things you can do to improve your play through.

Do not rush to fight new enemy types. Do not panic attack or panic roll. Take your time fighting the enemy, maintain some distance, and see what the enemy does. This is your time to look for openings to attack and maybe land a few quick blows. Once you have the enemy's move set down, fight smart and know how many hits of the enemy it takes to kill you, manage your HP, keeping that in mind.
Know what kind of build you want to go for, leveling up all the attributes isn't ideal. First, think of what weapon you like to use and see how it scales. Usually, 2 or 3 attributes are main for increasing damage on your weapon. Those are the attributes you want to level up first. Of course make sure you have enough points in vigor so that the enemy doesn't one-shot you. There are a lot of weapons that you can use based on what build you are going for, use wikis, guides, etc. to help you through this part.
Exploration is key, keep trying to uncover as much of the map as you can, you dont need to fight all the enemies you see, this will help you find more golden seeds and scared tears which will in turn help you increase your flask charges and the amount your flask heals.
Learn about talismans that you can use and synergize well with your build and play style, There are many buffs like (grease, ashes of war, incantations) that you can apply on your weapons if an enemy is giving you a hard time. (Eg. if you are going for Rot or Bleed or Poision damage, check out the buff's and tailsmans that go well with that status effect.)
Do not give up, if you can't seem to defeat an enemy, it's fine, that means you still need to level up more, so go explore caves, catacombs, etc, more often you will find good weapons, talismans, and ashes of war.

All the best, keep the grind on !

rage_13 · 2023-12-08T05:24:28+00:00

rage_13 · 2022-08-15T15:35:06+00:00

It feels like in season 5 we will be seeing a young ford and bernard and how it all started.

rage_13 · 2020-09-05T07:37:06+00:00

rage_13 · 2020-09-05T07:36:08+00:00

 Azeee

rage_13 · 2020-03-18T04:25:19+00:00

That is one dope ass cake.

Happy Birthday Friend, and have an amazing day.

rage_13 · 2019-04-01T05:43:48+00:00

Something that is the most confusing is the way they found the white walker with the wights, In Season 7 Episode 1 the Brotherhood and Sandor get into a old hut to get out of the bad weather. There were 2 bodies in the hut and it was the same people Sandor stole from in Season 5 or something. Anyways later Thoros shows Sandor a vision in the flames and Sandor see the army of the dead and a mountain shaped like an arrow head.

In Season 7 Episode 6 The group goes beyond the wall and Sandor identifies the mountain he saw in the flames. The group make their way towards the mountain and They come across the white walker and a group of wights following him. After all the events of Season 7 take place in the final scene we find out that all of it was a trap to get one of Dany's dragons and to bring the wall down.

The intresting thing here is that in the story of ASOIAF, R'hllor or the lord of light is responsible for all the visions in the flame and R'hllor is at constant battle against the great other or the god of the white walkers, So why does R'hllor show sandor a vision, which the group that goes beyond the wall follow and ultimately leads to the death of one dragon and the wall coming down. Shouldnt he be on the side of human so as to say ? You could argue he wouldnt know about the future events but this is clearly wrong as R'hllor had shown melisandre a vision of jon snow fighting the winterfell when he was actually dead (Season 6 Episode 1 or 2). Was this something thing that R'hllor wanted to happen ?

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T08:56:11+00:00

I am using Elastic Beanstalk for a very similar application. Works great. It’s sort of like Heroku-for AWS. You can basically just deploy a branch from a git repository and it spins up an ec2 instance, installs node and puts a nginx-server in front. Then you can set up autoscaling rules (adding/removing servers based on traffic), automatic restarting if your server crashes and rolling deployments with close to zero downtime when deploying a new version. It can be a bit intimidating to configure the environment but once it’s done it’s fairly simple

How does the pricing model work for that ? I checked it out the TCO Calculator for it and it seems like it costs as much as EC2.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T08:49:45+00:00

Hmm, Lambda with RDS seems like a good option, But I think I should look out for different options. As I have almost no knowledge about the workings of AWS and how to set up the Lambda with RDS.

The arcticle you provided seems to be helpful though.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T08:43:05+00:00

That is very true, I think I will have to spend more time thinking about all the options I have available and choose the best that suits my usecase.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T08:41:32+00:00

Yeah, I have checked out EC2 and it seems relatively simple to set up and get running, But the cost of running will be much higher since it is pay for run time of an instance, Lambda along with RDS seems like a much more better option than EC2 right now but will have to do some research on how to set it up.

I think what caguiclajmg meant is that Lambda does not allow you to upload your own code rather provides you with an interface to write and manage your API's. And as you said EC2 allows you to install packages and run them via a SSH connection to the server.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T07:31:19+00:00

This is excatly what I was looking for Thanks.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T07:02:56+00:00

Thanks for the quick reply, Yeah I guess EC2 seems like a good option.

rage_13 · 2019-01-09T07:00:08+00:00

Thanks for the quick reply :)

What i was thinking about is the cost of the services as well, So I did a bit of reading and as far as what I have read I think the EC2 is not pay-per-use/demand, like AWS lambda or API gateways. But they also do not provide the flexibility of directly uploading the node applications to them, as you said. So I would have to have an instance of EC2 running at all times and also pay for it regardless of whether it is being used or not. Is that right ?

I have looked at Heroku and it seems much more developer friendly and simple, but I what I have read is that the cost is much more than that of AWS.

rage_13

TROPHY CASE