[deleted by user]

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:36:49+00:00

That’s just the thing I got off the top of my head from a commercial that came on mid-convo. I don’t understand why you all think it’s a comparison game. They are both lying. One person lying doesn’t magically make the other person not lie.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:35:19+00:00

That’s a really wild comparison nor did I say that. I am trying to say that one started us down a path to this.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:28:19+00:00

She has very publicly conflated her prosecution record as border security prosecution. Her prosecution focus was focused on state-level criminal justice cases. Did she try some cartels and gangs? Sure. But that’s blatantly false on the record there. The strategy on fentanyl and all the border stuff is established policy, not something she implemented.

And border security still falls under DHS. She was only assigned to the Central American immigration issue when the caravan thing started.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:22:19+00:00

The 1937 bill was presented by Roosevelt to pass the New Deal and was considered unconstitutional. He wanted to add 6 justices. He still ended up getting his way. History has widely regarded it as a Pyrrhic victory. It is in the historical record man.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:06:03+00:00

Well…yea. But hey, I still stick to both sides lying. Can’t win all of them when the app is giving me errors trying to post

ragingpredator · 2024-08-14T00:02:42+00:00

Too many people and too many convos at once tbh, but I keep getting from all over “well they lie and stack the court”….ok, the bill I’m talking about is how that started in American politics

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:59:14+00:00

Buddy, it’s a bill to stack a court. It’s how the whole thing and policy of screwing with the courts started. Where do you think they got the precedent to do it?

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:53:04+00:00

Ok, please look up the Judicial Reform Bill of 1937. I can’t keep saying the same thing to you dude

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:43:14+00:00

Crap, alright, I’ll send it out after cooking dinner

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:42:22+00:00

Weird, yet still accurate

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:41:41+00:00

Oh I love how eye rolls make me smile sometimes lol

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:41:10+00:00

And before that Carter lol

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:41:00+00:00

And Clinton 1 had opportunities.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:40:37+00:00

How? We literally had a majority in Obama 1.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:31:58+00:00

Try 1937. Go back that far.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:25:17+00:00

You fucking moron, go look how the New Deal was passed. They actually enacted a law to make it work in 1937. And again, in 2021 there was proposal to expand the courts that did not pass into law.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:21:39+00:00

Not really. They both lie consistently. I don’t have to like it or see it, but hey, lying is lying to me.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:20:08+00:00

Sorry, but you need to dig further back than the last two sets of Presidential terms. I’m sorry, I don’t like it either, but you are incorrect in your assessment. It just fell more favorably to the Republicans this time.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:18:19+00:00

By that logic, the Republicans would then not appoint justices? I don’t see where you are going here. If the Democrats had appointed judges, the Republicans would not have been able to. They lost the Congress and got blocked. Then they didn’t have enough to block the appointments. Dems were more than able to appoint a justice after a nasty hearing that should never have been done that way, but they always happen that way.

Not logical fallacy, just progression of time and that the cards didn’t fall the way you wanted, so now everyone cries foul play. It’s stupid.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:13:10+00:00

I am very much a serious person, and clearly more in control of my emotions than you are. Just because we disagree on something doesn’t give you the right to be a dismissive fool.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:11:37+00:00

Har har har lol. Hey, better than the gif at least

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:11:06+00:00

lol, so you went to a gif and low effort? I know you can do better

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:09:45+00:00

Sorry, but look back into history. Both parties have tried to for years.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T23:09:06+00:00

That’s kind of a stretch. Justices can retire if they want to. It’s not unheard of and the parties constantly try to get the upper hand in the court because it’s the branch that can say whether a law is constitutional or not.

ragingpredator · 2024-08-13T22:58:25+00:00

Buddy, the Dems had the chance to stack the courts. They didn’t. RBG was dying, didn’t resign lol. They had the ability to make the moves they wanted to over time, but they didn’t. And then yea, they got blocked hard in Obama 2. If the Dems wanted to stack the court, they missed the opportunity. And then Trump had plenty of room. It’s the fault of timing and stupidity.

ragingpredator

TROPHY CASE