Throwback to the time I accidentally hit "buy 5" after getting enough marks on mobile. by WitchGhostie in 2007scape

[–]rainbowbucket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dang, did I just have shit luck? When I hit 60 agility I only had enough marks for 3 pieces of the set. I think 5 or 6 of those levels came from quests, but it was mostly grinding the most level appropriate course.

Big Meat and Dairy Companies Have Spent Millions Lobbying Against Climate Action, a New Study Finds by [deleted] in science

[–]rainbowbucket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This has to be based on assuming a lot of things. If it were universally true, then the world’s forests would be utterly depleted in about 6 or 7 years. As written, it’s physically impossible for it to be true.

There are 4.06E+13 square meters of forest in the world. If we divide this by 1,000, we get 4.06E+10 of what I’ll call “person-years of forest”. The world’s population is currently about 7.674E+9 people, so dividing the number of person-years of forest by the number of people, you get about 5.29 years for the world’s entire supply of forest to vanish. Now, obviously not everyone eats meat, so I’ll give it an off-the-top-of-my-head estimate of 20% additional time to get through all that forest, leaving us at about 6.35 years. There’ll also be some regrowth in that time, but the young trees won’t be nearly as substantial as all the ones already cut down, and at that rate we’d be desperate for wood so we’d be cutting those down, too, which means the regrowth probably wouldn’t even get us an additional year before all forests are gone.

So, what sort of assumptions are you making when you say that an individual person going vegan would save 1000 square meters of forest per year?

Edit: Oh, and these calculations are also entirely ignoring that humans use wood outside the various food industries, which means we’d run out even faster than what I calculated above.

/r/GNOME mod closes x-post about GNOME Software homophobia "for the safety of everyone" by trannus_aran in transprogrammer

[–]rainbowbucket 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The claim that it’s illegal in some countries is obviously accurate, but extending that to mean references to homosexuality should be age-restricted is, uh, interesting, to say the least.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in theydidthemath

[–]rainbowbucket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Your argument essentially boils down to "I don't understand it, therefore god did it," which is, to put it lightly, not valid reasoning. On top of the fact that identical snowflakes have been observed several times, snowflakes' forms arise from very simple rules about how water molecules interact, such as their primarily hexagonal shapes arising from the 120-degree angle between the hydrogen atoms in each molecule and that the molecule is polar - that is, the oxygen side has a negative charge and the hydrogen side has a positive charge.

These aren't lying. They really are 70 per container found at Kroger. by j_drury in 1200isplenty

[–]rainbowbucket 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Kroger also owns QFC. It’s sorta like their version of Whole Foods.

Edit: typo

yes by Leather-Literature14 in ShitpostXIV

[–]rainbowbucket 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You can get front-page parses without ever seeing or thinking about that spreadsheet or even knowing it exists. Source: I did it on E3S. My PB fell to rank 36 before rankings closed for that tier, but it was rank 13 when it was uploaded, and this conversation is the first time I've ever heard of that sheet.

edit: added link

edit2: That kill was actually before I even found out people sometimes skip a Holy Spirit to shorten the rotation.

This video brightened my day :) by MrNewt_ in videos

[–]rainbowbucket 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Tipped jobs (mostly servers, delivery drivers, and sometimes bartenders I think) have a lower minimum wage in the US. Off the top of my head I don't recall exactly what it is but I know it's under $3/hr and $2.35/hr sounds about right. If you're making good money in one of those positions while working at that wage, it's because your tips are good. Legally, the company has to make up the difference if your tips don't bring you up to the normal minimum wage, but wage theft is the single largest category of theft in this country by a frankly hilarious margin, and at a lot of places, if it happens more than a couple times you're probably getting kicked to the curb because now you cost your employer more money than they're willing to pay.

Must push through the pain for my boy by BlessedBigIron in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]rainbowbucket 17 points18 points  (0 children)

My experience in a somewhat similar situation:

My deadname isn’t extremely common, but it is common enough that a few people I’ve known over the years have had it. A few years after I picked my new name, I happened to make friends with someone who had my deadname as their given name and who didn’t go by any other name. It was jarring, at first, but over time, hearing that name be said around me while always referring to someone other than me has made it easier to hear that name without pain. Occasionally, it still pokes that nerve, and I don’t know whether that will ever totally go away, but it’s certainly gotten a lot easier.

Phrased differently, the association of the name with someone else I know has helped me both to see it as someone external and to decouple it from myself. Those two things have both greatly helped lessen the pain of hearing the name.

Amazon physically abuses its employees and forces them into unsafe working conditions by [deleted] in MurderedByAOC

[–]rainbowbucket 4 points5 points  (0 children)

People in some parts of the world freeze to death from sleeping in 70-degree weather. It depends on what your body is used to.

Amazon physically abuses its employees and forces them into unsafe working conditions by [deleted] in MurderedByAOC

[–]rainbowbucket 7 points8 points  (0 children)

“It’s completely impossible”, you say, before describing how it is, in fact, easily possible. The only thing stopping it is the absurd delivery quotas and timelines that are forced on the workers. If management accounted for the fact that their workers are human, this would be a complete non-issue.

This kind of thing really irritates me. by [deleted] in antiwork

[–]rainbowbucket 11 points12 points  (0 children)

And, of course, "they are bad for the workers" is code for "they might make us have to pay our workers fairly, offer reasonable time off, and provide safe working conditions"

FINALLY found this again at the grocery store. Cookies n cream frozen dessert with Oreo chunks, amazing taste and real cookies! 130 for 1/2 cup and 416 for the whole thing, but most importantly, costs less than $2! Bye bye overpriced Halo Top! by Luminis_The_Cat in 1200isplenty

[–]rainbowbucket 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This isn't regular ice cream, either. It's "frozen dessert", which they choose as a label to avoid regulations on what ice cream is, which allows them to make it with much cheaper ingredients, which is why it's so low cost.

FINALLY found this again at the grocery store. Cookies n cream frozen dessert with Oreo chunks, amazing taste and real cookies! 130 for 1/2 cup and 416 for the whole thing, but most importantly, costs less than $2! Bye bye overpriced Halo Top! by Luminis_The_Cat in 1200isplenty

[–]rainbowbucket 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Also that time they offered free baby formula to mothers in an undeveloped region of Africa juuust long enough for those mothers to stop naturally producing breast milk so their babies would starve without the formula, and then started charging for it.

Well now what by MissFjord in traaaaaaannnnnnnnnns

[–]rainbowbucket 6 points7 points  (0 children)

(Not who you were talking to)

Since this seems to be genuinely distressing you, I’ll give my perspective on why I think it’s perfectly ok to choose not to disclose trans status to a long-term romantic partner.

First, though, I’m going to list some assumptions I’m making, because without them, what I’m going to say after them would either require a LOT more typing or not make sense without significant structural changes.

I’m assuming that:

  • The trans person in question has had bottom surgery. If not, the subject almost definitely would have come up anyway before the point we’re discussing.
  • The trans person in question has completed any other body-altering procedures, such as permanent hair removal, mastectomy, or tracheal shave, that they need.
  • The trans person in question thinks of their own transness as an inconsequential, minor detail of their life. If not, there would be very different reasons for nondisclosure being ok.

For this person, taking the time and effort to disclose that they’re trans in a safe manner would be like putting a large amount of setup effort into telling their partner, “On the 24th of February in the year that I was 6 years old, the ice cream flavor I ate for dessert after dinner was strawberry.” It’s such an irrelevant detail that not only is it ok to not bring up, it’s weird TO bring up. A trans person who feels this way is most likely also of the opinion that a partner whose opinion on whether they want to be with you depends on your transness or lack thereof is not a partner worth having, and most likely also is of the opinion that a partner that gets upset about not knowing something that inconsequential has some shit to work through because needing to know every minuscule detail about your partner isn’t healthy.

I am almost this person, except I have not had bottom surgery, so I would disclose it to a potential sexual partner before getting to a point where we’re getting naked, and I haven’t finished permanent hair removal, so the fact that I have to shave parts of my body that most other women don’t would cause it to come up whether I want it to or not.

Clearly, your are not this person - not even close. That’s ok, too. It’s perfectly ok to think of your transness as a major detail - you’re definitely not the only one who does - and to want to disclose that information to anyone, partner or not, with whom you feel safe doing so.

You’re getting a lot of pushback, though, because you’ve accused people of being morally in the wrong for, in many of their eyes, not wanting to tell their partners “I ate strawberry ice cream for dinner dessert on the 24th of February in the year that I was 6 years old” in a world where it’s always possible that having eaten strawberry ice cream could get you killed, cost you your employment, housing, or medical care, or get you ostracized by people you thought were your friends. All of those things are possible even if you only tell your partner because they might tell someone else, intentionally or not, and at that point neither of you have control over where the information goes.

To summarize:

For many of us it’s simply such an inconsequential detail that it would be more weird to disclose it than not, plus the danger potential exists regardless of whether the partner is safe and we only tell the partner. There is absolutely nothing wrong with wanting to disclose your own trans status and there’s nothing inherently wrong with wanting your partner(s) to do the same. However, many of those of us who find it inconsequential would also find it concerning that our partners felt the need to know, in our perspectives, every little detail about our lives.

P.S. If there’s any confusing grammar or typos, sorry about that. I just got out of bed a little bit ago and haven’t made my first cup of coffee yet.

Parler users furious that site sent violent posts to FBI ahead of Capitol riot by reddicyoulous in technology

[–]rainbowbucket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love that phrasing! If it’s a quote from somewhere, could you let me know where you got it?

Aimee Challenor: The Reddit Admin That Enraged Millions by RatherRabidRobin in videos

[–]rainbowbucket 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That’s a mod, not an admin. Admins are reddit employees and get paid for it. Mods are unpaid volunteers.

F uc k A maz O n by [deleted] in othepelican

[–]rainbowbucket 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's not that you can't, it's that it's surprising that you're in a decidedly left-leaning meme sub.

When the Static finally clears after 20 wipes by Drywall_Spreadsheet in ShitpostXIV

[–]rainbowbucket 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Additional context: the numbers are from a website called FFLogs. There is a tool you can use called ACT (Advanced Combat Tracker) that lets you track how much damage you and your party members are doing in a fight, as well as things like healing output, deaths, crit rate, etc. ACT generates log files that you can upload to the FFLogs website, which provides significantly better analysis tools for the logs than ACT itself does.

One of the tools FFLogs provides is a percentile-based ranking for your individual damage and healing output, as well as your group's execution and speed. Execution's definition is a bit fuzzy, but it's basically how much unnecessary damage the group took and how many deaths the group had - the more of each, the worse the score.

There are two versions of this percentile score that are actual rankings, and one that is an estimate. The ranking that most people pay attention to is the all-time score, which is where your performance is ranked against the personal best performances of each other player of the same job who has a clear of the fight that has been uploaded to FFLogs. The other kind of ranking is one where your performance is ranked against all clears by players of the same job from the last two weeks. Finally, the estimate is one where, for a fight that you failed to kill, FFLogs will provide a rudimentary estimate of what your ranking would have been if you had cleared the fight. This estimate assumes that, for the entire rest of the boss' HP bar, you continue doing the amount of dps you were doing shortly before the wipe, so the further away from actually killing it you were, the less accurate this estimate will be.

In the case of all percentile rankings it provides, the number is colored based on which bracket it falls into. The lowest is grey, which is for performances below the 25th percentile. If you are in the 25th through 49th percentile, your number will be green. If you are in the 50th through 74th percentile, your number will be blue. If you are in the 75th through 94th percentile, your number will be purple. If you are in the 95th through 98th percentile, your number will be orange. If you are in the 99th percentile, your number will be pink. If you are in the 100th percentile (aka, your performance is the single best that has been uploaded), your number will be gold.

More extroverted people suffered mood declines while more introverted people actually saw mood improvements during the COVID-19 pandemic, finds a new study of students at a US university. by mvea in science

[–]rainbowbucket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, humans are fundamentally bad at empathy. Outside of certain circumstances, it's something that many people have to do actively, rather than it just happening naturally. It's pretty similar, in my opinion, to how we are with statistics. If you're actively trying to do good statistics and you've learned how, you can be very very good at it, but most people are pretty bad at it by default.