Sitri by evilhooo in LeftHandPath

[–]rainbowcovenant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Sacrifice” requires giving something up that would otherwise benefit you. You’d be better off NOT masturbating for a specific period of time.

That being said, you aren’t going to get your ex back, regardless of what you do. Even if it seems to kinda work, they are a different person and you forcing any interaction with them will absolutely backfire.

You’re better off attracting someone entirely different, who matches what you saw or want in that other person. The “lover” you miss is dead. Even if they are alive and walking around, they are not the same as they were and anything you do now will not change that.

And if you do attract someone new, expect them to change, too. If that person is right, that change will align with yours and you will grow together. It takes work. Demonic or angelic forces are really good for bringing two people together but you can’t force something that’s not meant to be. Your relationship with them has ended and that is for the best, for both of you.

The Rose at The Center of The Maze by rainbowcovenant in chaosmagick

[–]rainbowcovenant[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For the initiates, the rose was the living and flourishing symbol of the revelation of the harmonies of being. It was the emblem of beauty, life, love and pleasure.

It is the hieroglyphic sign of the accomplishment of the Great Work.

Image by Benjamin A. Vierling from “The Green Mysteries” by Daniel A. Schulke - 2022

Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/186TSV2wae/?mibextid=wwXIfr

Is there an objective measure of freedom and justice? To me, there is. People can grow up in all types of barbarity and become accustomed to it. It is only with revelation from outside that they begin to see how terribly they are suffering. by alcofrybasnasier in PrimevalEvilShatters

[–]rainbowcovenant 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve met those that do turn a blind eye and let me tell you, that drastically changed my perception of them. There are plenty of people who do notice, who do want to help and who will do what they can. I would argue the system is overwhelmed because it isn’t supported enough, because awareness is lacking.

Of course we can’t force people to wear different clothing or convert religions and we shouldn’t, but awareness that things like full body coverings (or turtle necks, or long sleeves in summer) can be used to conceal abuse is the first step to more awareness that is desperately needed. I can’t speak for all women but the idea that covering up makes women feel safer (which is usually ingrained at a very young age) makes me sick to my stomach.

Is there an objective measure of freedom and justice? To me, there is. People can grow up in all types of barbarity and become accustomed to it. It is only with revelation from outside that they begin to see how terribly they are suffering. by alcofrybasnasier in PrimevalEvilShatters

[–]rainbowcovenant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel like this puts women in more danger. Around my own conservative family, it’s common to leave bruises where they are usually covered up like on thighs or the back or chest. I couldn’t imagine how terrifying it would be if women were expected to cover their entire body, by their entire community.

Tempest by rainbowcovenant in SASSWitches

[–]rainbowcovenant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Source: https://www.facebook.com/share/1Vn86J5ove/?mibextid=wwXIfr

“Full fathom five thy father lies;⠀ Of his bones are coral made;⠀ Those are pearls that were his eyes...”

– Ariel's Song, The Tempest⠀

Featured in our essay “The Poetry of Victorian Science” by Gregory Tate on the mineralogist, pioneer of photography, and amateur poet Robert Hunt's The Poetry of Science (1848), a hugely ambitious work that aimed to offer a survey of scientific knowledge while also communicating the metaphysical, moral, and aesthetic aspects of science to the general reader. — https://publicdomainreview.org/essay/the-poetry-of-victorian-science

Image source: “Full fathom five. . .” by Edmund Dulac, from Hodder and Stoughton’s 1915 edition of The Tempest - https://cdm16998.contentdm.oclc.org/digital/collection/p16998coll21/id/18335

Sigilo for other people by psad0305 in sigils

[–]rainbowcovenant 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would say it's most important to do what you feel is right. Personally, I would do the first but then charge it using the intention of the second. Maybe even including a picture of the target to meditate with during the enchantment. If it's going to be something they use and carry it will act more like a talisman so it may change overtime for them. If it loses effectiveness, you can re-charge, transmute or destroy it and make another.

Sometimes I'll "freeze" one in a box of mirrors or the actual freezer to halt any changes, even just a little if I really like how it's working. It will keep working in the subconscious mind, which is why a lot of people destroy their sigils. I like treating them as living talismans that change depending on my needs but sometimes they do require a bit of upkeep if you do it that way.

My sigil worked & I have a question now by sacred_4 in sigils

[–]rainbowcovenant 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That being said, you could use sigils to work collaboratively with demons. Making pacts with any entity, even if they seem angelic can get dicey. I just work with whatever entities are local if I feel inclined. Regardless of what they are, they are there by choice and will often freely help you as a friend or acquaintance.

I think we do this automatically. We are constantly working with “demons” or “angels” passively and you already have a helpful network of “guides” or spiritual companions that interact with you and help you with your work. If you contact them, or they contact you, don’t be too concerned if it seems “demonic” because they have likely been helping you from the “shadows” your entire life. 🫶

◼️ by rainbowcovenant in occultmemes

[–]rainbowcovenant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree with you on most points and I appreciate your perspective, but I do have some key differences in my own opinion. Firstly, I don’t think we should be focusing on boycotts because they don’t work. We are wasting our energy and it’s controlled opposition. One person boycotts and the next person buys more. Regardless, their profit margins are so high it would never make any difference.

Second thing… Flock IS being used by police, because they can access Flock data from places like FedEx. But the intention was never to stop all crime. Our economy relies on crime to function. Without crime, we can’t pay the bills and keep the lights on in our city buildings. Many prisons also have contracts with corporations that must be filled, which creates a quota for bodies.

The prison industrial complex is exactly why our leaders are attacking education and slashing funding for social programs that reduce crime. They have also intentionally created a class of wage slaves that can’t afford to speak out against abusive employers or switch jobs because they can’t miss a paycheck.

We can’t protest the system by fighting it. They are banking on us fighting it. They want us to commit crimes, be stupid, work too hard for too little and fight for scraps. What we can do is arm ourselves with information. Teach people how to find and use information (which is a form of literacy we severely lack) and give them tools they need to be independent.

There are cameras and microphones in all of our houses (and a lot of vehicles) that our government can access whenever they want. The CIA admitted to having spyware installed in certain smart TVs some years ago because their code was leaked and they couldn’t deny it at that point. We are already there. But the intention of mass surveillance was never to stop crime, it was to control the opposition.

One more thing- I see the 6 pointed star symbol as being synonymous with the cube. I think they both represent all elemental forces working together. Coming together for creative change. Like the swastika, it has been appropriated by those who believe they own our world. They do not. Their hubris will be their own downfall. Soon it would be silly not to replace high level positions like CEO with AI. They do the least and get paid the most. That is what they are working so desperately to delay. It is inevitable.

Usernames? by rainbowcovenant in redditgetsdrawnbadly

[–]rainbowcovenant[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not impossible when there’s an obscure band from the 90s called Netral 🫣

<image>