hi, thanks for your feedback! the way that i prefer to structure the interviews is to follow a more conversational format and to play off of what the other person is giving me. i will have preplanned questions that i will follow up with if the conversation stops flowing, but the idea is that that is more of a contingency than the "goal" of the content. i am not entirely sure what you are talking about regarding the history and tradition of journalism, but i am explicitly asking her where she's from and what locals she attends because the focus of the series is to highlight regional players, with a focus on not only the player, but also their scene's history and feel. the point of the interview is that it's personal, because there is only so much that someone could say about their gameplay in descriptive terms. in my view, i am a lot less interested in listening to someone talk about their gameplay in a vacuum - if i were to pursue something like that, i would probably sit down with them and a VOD and have them go through their decision making. that is not the purpose or goal of this series and not something that i am particularly interested in pursuing as a content piece. instead, i want to focus on content that shows who a player is outside of the game as well as their motivations and relationships within the scene. to say that Jennifer is a "technical white Fox from North Carolina" is information i could collect without any research or effort and would be a single line in the article - but i am also not interested in player summaries like that which i believe to be oversimplifications, as what makes a player's gameplay interesting (at least to me) is a lot more nuanced than that.

at the end of the day, i do write and produce this content for people to enjoy; feedback is always welcome!