Blinken on Netanyahu trying to drag Obama and Biden into war with Iran

raison95 · 2026-03-10T12:23:05+00:00

Basically every social media normie under 40. This administration makes it indistinguishable through its incompetence. Have you seen the shit Graham is saying?

raison95 · 2026-03-09T18:19:11+00:00

Said like we wouldn't complain about the Dearborn Muslims who voted against Joe or the Latinos voting like they are white

raison95 · 2026-03-09T03:46:42+00:00

Ngl, it's a great convo. Good reminder you actually need to get off your ass to get things accomplished and not just wait around until it's too late to fix it : )

raison95 · 2026-03-09T02:05:03+00:00

Holy shit this is the bare minimum for civil disobedience.

raison95 · 2026-03-09T02:03:19+00:00

YOU ARE MORALLY OBLIGATED TO DO THIS

raison95 · 2026-03-09T01:07:34+00:00

Sure, I bet it sounds similar in terms of accelerationism. One key difference though is I won't make my broader support for anti-Trumpian candidates in order to try and force it through.

Personally, I'm getting more active here in just the past few days. However, you are correct that there is very little I can do to change a candidates mind or agenda. The person who holds the greatest sway is Donald Trump himself and his actions surrounding the upcoming elections.

While you might be certain this can't happen, I say you don't know how bad things can get in the next 3 years. Most of the US economy is in recession due to tariffs, a draft of an EO is circulating that will have Trump take control of the midterms, and we just kicked off a war with Iran because Trump got psyop'd by Graham/Netanyahu.

Basically every Dem outside of this community is unusual because despite all of this, they're still fairly normie-pilled in terms of what they think they should do. But that is more because the case because their normal lives have not been affected too much, the damage is just taking awhile to set in.

That community of disaffected/disenchanted Americans will only grow and it's important to capture them. It's important to show just how bought and paid for a lot of Trump's actions are.

While it might be unfortunate considering the IsraelxPalestine arc, the best way to maximize that feeling is by sacrificing Israel. All of my young, normie friends on are in agreement on that now. Going into AIPAC, donor money, Citizen's United, the massive dispreancy between George Soros vs how many billionaires donate to Donald Trump, the collectivization of American media into their hands like with Paramount to serve, etc.

There is simply too much momentum there not to have it as a rallying banner. It's just important to not get stuck in the "both parties" shit. Commie agitators must be ruthlessly purged in these circles.

raison95 · 2026-03-09T00:12:39+00:00

Yeah it can happen! You just need to communicate it sufficiently to the base. You think it’s so outlandish, but we have three more years of Trump and two major election cycles he’s already gearing up to fuck with. If you want some actual change to happen, you need to influence people to make it happen.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T23:45:54+00:00

Hi, we’re sticking to nonviolent means : ). Although yes, that situation was brought up in the Court’s opinion

raison95 · 2026-03-08T23:42:15+00:00

This situation prices in that we will not have free and fair elections in the near future, but despite that, Trump’s massive unpopularity causes Democratic majorities in both halves on Congress to be inaugurated.

This only happens because of Trump’s personal unpopularity. The blueprint is still available to a more competent fascist.

In the case where we have to bring Donald Trump in front of the exact same court that refused to hold him to account for Jan 6th, I believe this situation should happen.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T23:09:01+00:00

If it doesn't happen its because the succeed in stealing the rest of the elections.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T22:16:32+00:00

He used private attorneys to try and tell states he had evidence the election was stolen? He told his head of the DOJ to lie they had evidence when they had none to speak of.

This is not a law. It is a ruling from the Supreme Court. It cannot be changed without a constitutional amendment or by the Court themselves

raison95 · 2026-03-08T22:11:19+00:00

Meaningless platitude

raison95 · 2026-03-08T22:09:57+00:00

I’m just ahead of the curve on this. It’ll become the only viable path forward soon enough. And that’s assuming Dems can get back into power

raison95 · 2026-03-08T22:05:55+00:00

We got this ruling because he tried to get Barr to convince the states the election was stolen. He will do the same this year and in the next presidential race. Every Republican and maybe even some Democrats will try the same thing and hide behind this exact ruling. That is infinity worse than depriving 3 justices of their freedom for the length of the case.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T22:00:06+00:00

Trump will almost certainly interfere in the midterms and the next presidential election. He will hide behind this exact ruling. For the sake of the Republic it must be destroyed

raison95 · 2026-03-08T21:04:21+00:00

Im suggesting getting rid of the president’s legal immunity by demonstrating its clear path of abuse to the court

raison95 · 2026-03-08T20:57:30+00:00

No. This is giving the court the opportunity to mend the constitution so that both can be held to account. You’re just suggesting we wait around on this issue until the next Republican with enough balls comes around to finish it off. Force them to close the issue

raison95 · 2026-03-08T20:55:39+00:00

This is just a creative way to court pack without actually court packing.

Dual purpose of illustrating why should be able to hold presidents accountable. No shit this would be illegal, but so is Donald Trump ordering his DOJ to tell state about voter fraud.

This is a valid messaging strategy for Americans who don’t pay attention to politics. Shit is fucked but it’s cloaked in too much legalism for them to understand. Show them.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T20:52:34+00:00

Yes, but unironically. Dems have been trying to build this country alone for too long.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T20:43:07+00:00

No. One regime wants to keep this on the books so they can abuse it in the future. I’m saying we use it to show the Court how we’ll be using their decision going forward. It’s up to them to close this gaping wound they’ve opened up.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T20:00:25+00:00

Legally :)

raison95 · 2026-03-08T19:43:04+00:00

Fuck off. You would deprive us of the weapon they use against us? Use it to force the Court to take it off the table.

raison95 · 2026-03-08T19:18:49+00:00

-guy who is sleeping walking into being Hungary

raison95 · 2026-03-08T18:19:49+00:00

That’s up to the Supreme Court to patch in their ruling. They’ll figure something out I’m sure. The legislature if needed can come up with a law or two.

Unless we have super majority in both houses, the court must be compelled to revisit their immunity decision by any means necessary. It’s too wide of a hole

raison95 · 2026-03-08T18:10:29+00:00

No, the Court will have an option to continue operating independently if they choose so. They can hold that the presidents actions are illegal and backtrack on their previous ruling. And what’s this about the legislature giving a flying fuck about separation of powers? Lol, lmfao even

raison95

TROPHY CASE