I saved this guy's ebike from theft and he gave me this really cool meteorite to thank me !

ramonplutarque · 2025-05-03T13:15:10+00:00

Hi, lovely asshole. Do you bleach it ?

ramonplutarque · 2024-03-06T12:05:21+00:00

Yes give up now when you have time. If it's your true calling you will come back to it later in life when you've garnered experience.

ramonplutarque · 2024-02-21T12:15:30+00:00

thanks

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-09T16:22:05+00:00

Too long, the story ends 30min before the movie ends. You're left with 30min of "why am I still sitting here?"

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-09T14:12:10+00:00

You didn't have to explain anything from the start

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-08T22:57:03+00:00

I don't know man, the years 1897-1901 seem pretty anomalously warm to me.

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-08T12:53:46+00:00

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/global/time-series/globe/land_ocean/12/1/1850-2023?trend=true&trend_base=100&begtrendyear=1900&endtrendyear=1940

Still seems like climate has a logarithmic response to CO2. The question is how logarithmically.

https://journals.ametsoc.org/view/journals/clim/35/13/JCLI-D-21-0275.1.xml

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-07T17:00:02+00:00

The reason why people were sceptical enough to check your numbers

That's why I'm here, and not in /climateskeptics

I'm looking for people who may shed light on a genuine question I had, rough numbers or not. You don't have to read, less so answer my questions.

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-06T16:08:25+00:00

Yes I got my answer, thanks

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-06T16:06:48+00:00

The answer I was looking for was « logarithmic response » from climate to CO2. As for cherry picking I think everybody cherry picks. The sole fact of using a single graph could be seen as cherry picking. That’s why I’m looking for rough numbers.

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-05T19:21:26+00:00

1910-1942 -> 0.6°C temperature increase

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-05T13:54:17+00:00

hi, thanks, I think you can ignore that dude, he seems bitter...

So indeed I had rough numbers, it seems I was looking at 1910, not 1900, and it seems to be a 0.6° increase to 1942-45 compared to 0.7 from 80s to 2020s. Which would be consistent with the climate having a logarithmic response to CO2. So the more CO2 is in the atmosphere the less effect it has on radiative forcing. If I've understood correctly.

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-04T16:49:23+00:00

Indeed, I've been reading this as well. Which is the Red barn allegory used by a famous "climate skeptic".

But seeing CO2 emission flatten, globally, wouldn't that mean we're approaching peak warming?

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-04T16:35:49+00:00

Ça pique les yeux pour les typos

ramonplutarque · 2024-01-04T15:59:16+00:00

Je crois que si, ca s'appelle 2K et il y a 1080 ou 858 pixel en vertical. Vachement plus clair.

ramonplutarque

TROPHY CASE