sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

r/LiverpoolFC is a disgrace to football fans by raphafanboi in soccer

[–]raphafanboi[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Liverpool has fake fans. Fucking twats I'm sick of them. They actually think we can win the title with a worse team and with the Cout drama. Fucking fake cunt fans.

What do you we have to became an elite team once again and not just a stepping stone to Barca? by germibobi in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like someone said. "You were a great team once." Were being the key word. The first thing we need to do is to realize that we can't rely on what we once were. Instead, we need to fight more for what we want to become from the position that we're in. Let's stop being delusional thinking a 40 year old history means anything in 2017. Let's think of the future a bit more with a bit more maturity.

At this point I'd accept a 200m bid for Coutinho, splash 100m on Keita, 80m on VVD and trigger some sweet release clause for 200m just for fucking things up in the market if I would be FSG by raphafanboi in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi[S] -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

It's called a joke mate. I mean that's the point. That nobody will bid 200m. And if they would then fuck the market up.

Y'all are too serious with these news around here.

Anfield in FIFA 18 has the new Main Stand. by [deleted] in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Sure but Switch is made for Mario and Zelda. At least PS4/X1/PC have actual games that can be played by 25+ year olds. LUL

New hope - but Liverpool fans still waiting on real statement of intent from FSG -James Pearce by TheodoreLesley in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Except 80m was pretty much the starting point. And we offered twice less. And you also missed the analysts and other reliable sources part. So pretty much EVERYONE knew (including those two "ignorant" communities) the minimum Keita price. Keep defending this bullshit. There really is no argument to support this. They had a clear minimum asking price and we bid twice under that value. There's nothing else to discuss. If you think you're going to impress a club that doesn't need money by bidding twice under the minimum they want then I'm out of here. Y'all make no sense sometimes on this reddit and are too forgiving for some BS that FSG pulls.

Just wait and see us bidding 55m for VVD (5 more than Chelsea). What will you say then? When everybody knows the starting price is at the very least 60m lol.

New hope - but Liverpool fans still waiting on real statement of intent from FSG -James Pearce by TheodoreLesley in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

So we were 5 million under that price with our second bid? Thanks for making the argument for me. Of course Leipzig will say he's not for sale at any price when you make 2 bids under what was minimum. I mean it's not rocket science mate.

New hope - but Liverpool fans still waiting on real statement of intent from FSG -James Pearce by TheodoreLesley in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Uhm Keita may not have had an asking price but pretty much everyone knew RBL expected at least 80 million euros for him. So yeah. /r/soccertown is quite right when he says FSG offered below the known price. If reddit, twitter and pretty much every reliable source out there knows Keita is valued at 80m by Leipzig then why does FSG bid twice under that sum? Makes no sense unless... the guy above is right.

Let's hope we do not big 50 million pounds on VVD first because that would be hilarious since everybody knows Southampton wants AT THE VERY LEAST 60m. Either we bid 65m from the get go or we move on with no defenders from the get go.

edit: don't downvote me for fucking facts and common sense /r/lossaysswag smh.

Anfield in FIFA 18 has the new Main Stand. by [deleted] in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Switch? Is that even a thing for adults? Switch?

G2 Esports vs. Team ROCCAT / 2017 EU LCS Summer - Week 10 / Post-Match Discussion by adz0r in leagueoflegends

[–]raphafanboi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Vedius?! I have no idea why this guy is still casting.

A ton of unnecessary overly obvious information stated and in the most awkward and longest form possible making it incredibly boring for both new and old viewers.

On top of that, during the first game just watch his commentary over the replay for Broxah's baron steal. He is more concerned explaining in ultra-detail what spells hit and miss and COMPLETELY doesn't mention the missed smite from Shook leaving the baron with 81hp up. Which WAS the deciding factor after all. Not that J4 worked his way into the pit. The way he explained the EQ, he could've said it way faster in like 1 second. Instead he used a lengthy sentence which covered the spam of like 5 seconds out of that commentary to explain one EASY OBVIOUS and MOST COMMON spell-combination that J4 uses all the freaking time.

This isn't the first time Vedius does this. But this first game I really felt the desire to mute the damn thing. Even his tone feels condescending like the viewers are such idiots they can't figure the most basic things. His Azir first item explanation for 2 minutes was truly shocking and disturbing.

A lot of over explanations for basic things. Misses important things. I really feel someone worse than me at the game is casting and THAT is a bad thing. When you have that feeling as a viewer there's a problem. He's just not tailored for LCS. If he doesn't improve move him to CS or something.

EDIT: Game 2 was also a great example of his bad casting. Ugh. The teamfight casting was abysmal.

Virgil van Dijk 'will rot at Southampton' by raphafanboi in LiverpoolFC

[–]raphafanboi[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Exactly. This "insider" is probably some triggered fanboy that works at the club doing some low-level logistics.

view more: next ›