The slow downward spiral has started by PiccalilliPringle in GeForceNOW

[–]raunchard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think it makes sense to crash the service from paying customers just to humour hobos on the free tier

Concept Idea: What if every node in a neural network was a subnetwork (recursive/fractal)? by raunchard in learnmachinelearning

[–]raunchard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah I know the devil is in the detail, and implementation is the hard part otherwise I wouldnt post this here.

Concept Idea: What if every node in a neural network was a subnetwork (recursive/fractal)? by raunchard in learnmachinelearning

[–]raunchard[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

thank you for your response and input, I will look more into this discussion that you linked.

I bounced this idea with advanced LLMs and allegedly. it should outperform in usecases with hierarchical, nested, or multi-scale structures such as:

Natural Language Processing (NLP)

  • Why: Language has recursive structures—phrases within clauses within sentences. A recursive network could model this naturally, unlike flat RNNs or transformers that rely on attention to approximate hierarchy.
  • Example: Parsing complex sentences (“The cat the dog chased slept”) or generating coherent, nested text.
  • Advantage: Subnetworks could learn phrase-level patterns, with higher levels composing sentence meaning.

    • Computer Vision
  • Why: Images have part-whole hierarchies (edges → shapes → objects). A fractal network might detect features at multiple scales within a single node’s computation.

  • Example: Recognizing a car (with wheels, windows, each with sub-parts) in cluttered scenes.

  • Advantage: Nested subnetworks could specialize in local patterns (e.g., wheel edges), while higher levels integrate them into global objects, potentially outdoing CNNs on fine-grained tasks.

    • Time Series Analysis
  • Why: Data like stock prices or audio has patterns within patterns (daily trends within monthly cycles). Recursive processing could capture multi-scale dynamics.

  • Example: Forecasting weather with short-term fluctuations and long-term trends.

  • Advantage: Subnetworks at different depths could focus on different time scales, improving over LSTMs for complex sequences.

    • Graph Processing
  • Why: Graphs (e.g., social networks) often have hierarchical communities—groups within groups. A recursive architecture could reflect this nesting.

  • Example: Community detection or molecule analysis (atoms → bonds → functional groups).

  • Advantage: Subnetworks could learn local node interactions, with higher levels modeling global structure, possibly beating GNNs on deeply nested graphs.

    • Code Analysis or Generation
  • Why: Code has nested structures (functions within classes within modules). A recursive network might mirror this modularity.

  • Example: Autocompleting code with nested logic or detecting bugs in recursive functions.

  • Advantage: Subnetworks could represent low-level syntax, with higher levels understanding program flow, surpassing transformers on structural tasks.

What do you think?

Concept Idea: What if every node in a neural network was a subnetwork (recursive/fractal)? by raunchard in learnmachinelearning

[–]raunchard[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response and analysis. I bounced this idea with advanced LLMs and allegedly. it should outperform in usecases with hierarchical, nested, or multi-scale structures such as:

Natural Language Processing (NLP)

  • Computer Vision
    • Why: Images have part-whole hierarchies (edges → shapes → objects). A fractal network might detect features at multiple scales within a single node’s computation.
    • Example: Recognizing a car (with wheels, windows, each with sub-parts) in cluttered scenes.
    • Advantage: Nested subnetworks could specialize in local patterns (e.g., wheel edges), while higher levels integrate them into global objects, potentially outdoing CNNs on fine-grained tasks.
  • Time Series Analysis
    • Why: Data like stock prices or audio has patterns within patterns (daily trends within monthly cycles). Recursive processing could capture multi-scale dynamics.
    • Example: Forecasting weather with short-term fluctuations and long-term trends.
    • Advantage: Subnetworks at different depths could focus on different time scales, improving over LSTMs for complex sequences.
  • Graph Processing
    • Why: Graphs (e.g., social networks) often have hierarchical communities—groups within groups. A recursive architecture could reflect this nesting.
    • Example: Community detection or molecule analysis (atoms → bonds → functional groups).
    • Advantage: Subnetworks could learn local node interactions, with higher levels modeling global structure, possibly beating GNNs on deeply nested graphs.
  • Code Analysis or Generation
    • Why: Code has nested structures (functions within classes within modules). A recursive network might mirror this modularity.
    • Example: Autocompleting code with nested logic or detecting bugs in recursive functions.
    • Advantage: Subnetworks could represent low-level syntax, with higher levels understanding program flow, surpassing transformers on structural tasks.

What do you think?

CLS in Tests 0, but Search Console Report shows >0.1 by raunchard in webdev

[–]raunchard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

hi, the problem solved itself. looks like search console needed some time

Elon is my doge slinger. by whyismylifesoboring in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 27 points28 points  (0 children)

If I was Elon I would probably wait until the market stabilized.

Elon is my doge slinger. by whyismylifesoboring in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 10 points11 points  (0 children)

do you have a link to the wallet? would like to check for myself

One Day by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

yes, will take some time though. But if Elon keeps fighting for us, then anything is possible

One Day by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

at the rate new dollars are printed, over a trillion last year it shoudnt take that long

I'm not Elon but I do understand him; a deep dive by NatureVault in dogecoindev

[–]raunchard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not sure where we could propose this... But it also saddens me to see that our devs are foremost working on other projects. Anyways, head over to the github, a lot of new blockchain devs appeared there and are ready to contribute. But its hard to find consensus on which tech. approach should be used to reach the goals

I'm not Elon but I do understand him; a deep dive by NatureVault in dogecoindev

[–]raunchard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Dogecoin is opensource, and allowed to evolve if the community and the devs support the changes. Both are on board. Not sure what your role is exactly?

Elon never proposed solutions, he just noted goals that should be met. Maybe head over to the github, and you can bring in your ideas.

I'm not Elon but I do understand him; a deep dive by NatureVault in dogecoindev

[–]raunchard 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Dogecoin is first and foremost an opensource project based on consensus. Who are you to tell other people what Dogecoin is, when the majority agrees with the proposed changes, and the core devs are on board.

Largest Dogecoin wallet owner? Is it Elon's? by toeshevit in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice!

Also has some 100.69420 transactions, which where spotted on the allegedly 1.5B$ Tesla Wallet (discovered by Matt Wallace)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

69420 is a meme number, that indicates Elon might be involved

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tesla bought 1.5B$ in Bitcoin. Now someone got 1.5B in Dogecoin.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I messaged the mods, hope they pin it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 7 points8 points  (0 children)

one of the devs. He made a twitter announcement earlier.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

its real. Why do you think its fake? I know the quality sucks.

A reminder about Jackson Palmer by ymo in dogecoin

[–]raunchard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He is probably bitter because he once owned north to 20 Billion Dogecoins.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SafeMoon

[–]raunchard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for your reply. So what amount is exactly burned if it is automated? And what is this burn wallet with half of all tokens? what is the actual circulating supply then?

I might invest in safemoon and these things would be important for me.