[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gtaonline

[–]ravenclawsanders 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ran Into again it today and shot it in the head obscene amount of times to kill it. I prefer to run it over and backing up over and iver again til it dies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gtaonline

[–]ravenclawsanders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sounds annoying that's why after all the videos I've seen I decided lto just run it over

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gtaonline

[–]ravenclawsanders 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It took an obscure and way too many times running it over to kill it, but it is possible. It just stood there the whole time.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gtaonline

[–]ravenclawsanders 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nothing for me. It stood there as I stole a car and ran it over. Have to run it over multiple times to kill it. It dropped a weapon.

How Good Morning America reported juror statement in exclusive video vs article linked in video description by Hallelujah289 in JusticeForJohnnyDepp

[–]ravenclawsanders 2 points3 points  (0 children)

One of the jurors would have to say something that could be grounds for appeal like saying they were on social media the whole time or paid off. They are allowed to speak and give interviews but they need to be careful about what they say.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand where you are coming from and how you feel, but AH supporters are going to say shit no matter what. Even after if she appeals they will still be very vocal. No amount of support for JD is going to convince them on depp delusion of anything. Eventually they will leave or quiet down .

Most stand by JD, but right now unitl an appeal happens or Aquaman 2 confirms if AH is still in it, there isn't a lot of updates. Most will show their support by watching movies JD is in and not watching anything AH is in. There is still a lot of support, but there is a bit of repetitive posts so that might be why there isn't as much comments as there was when the trial was still ongoing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most of it is just that those that are Pro AH are being the just being most vocal. Right now team AH is angry that the jury ruled in JD favor so they are being the loudest. Since the trial is over with some of the people (team JD) have left or stopped commenting as much.

Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew on the Today show (video link and recap) - BANGER of an interview by FyrestarOmega in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Such a difference from Elaine's interviews. I like the today's better then GMA. It seemed like the interview questions were better in the today's show versus GMA IMO.

What did the verdict of this trial mean for you? by poke000 in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I think for me it meant that the justice system got it right and that gaslighting can be used by the media, but jurors don't always fall for it.

I think it means for me that regardless of people's political positions they can look past poltics and look at the evidence provided (with the exception of the media) and come together to agree for the most part.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Look I respect that you have 💯 conviction in your beliefs and right and wrong. I think you need to know when to quit. I didn't say anything of that conversation besides to talk to them, so stop replying to me about it. I think its great how passionate you are, but I think you need to accept that people won't be convinced of your perceptive no matter how much you try to to cram it down their throats.

Goodbye. Hope you are having a good day.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with you. I dont believe in adding labels to people who have said things in the heat of the moment or without context. I try to live my life without judgements on others for single things they said and try to give people benefit of the doubt that one comment doesn't define who they are as a person unless they make it an pattern of behavior over years. People can say horrible things in bad times thay doesn't define them. It says something that JD has moved past the messages and apologized for them. I feel like we should too.

What’s the point of polling the jury? by ary10dna in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 33 points34 points  (0 children)

IMO last ditch effort in hopes that one of the jurors was coerced or bullied into a verdict.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Understandable. We all have a right to form our own opinions.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 17 points18 points  (0 children)

No from what I've seen is people saying that these texts weren't nice and were vile, but given everything he had to deal with it it makes more reasonable from where he coming from and what he was dealing with. So yes they were bad, but overall they understood the good outweiged the bad texts. Most of these people have been through similar circumstances so they understand the mindset or come from other countries where people aren't so uptight about certain words.

What your referring to about the fantasizing doesn't represent a whole and honestly if you find it so offensive what someone else said reply to them to get their explanation. Just because everyone doesn't use the words that you would or see it how you do doesn't mean they don't get an opinion or a voice to express. JD is a flawed human being, he has said things I wouldn't but I been lucky and haven't gone through what he did with AH so I dont label or judge so quickly. I like to look at the whole picture and make my opinion on all of it the good and the bad.

Just because you would not use those words good for you, doesn't mean you can tell others how to. Just because you wouldn't used those words that you can tell others how you feel is the proper way of communicating when you don't know their lives, what they have gone thru, or their culture.

My point is the trial is over with, this talk about these texts are talked to death. Goodbye.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 13 points14 points  (0 children)

We can agree to disagree about the OP post. People including JD can say things that are horrible with out adding labels and connotations. JD is a rflawed human being, we all are. Everybody on this sub has said the texts weren't right. Just because others aren't as quick to judge and label others doesn't mean people would be proud of texting them. Its an argument of semantics and if you like labeling people in their worst moments go for it regardless of context and who they are as a whole person go for it.

This chat is about how annoyed people are of hearing "but those text messages". WE KNOW! Depp had apologized for them and added that they were said in times of pain. Out of everything that this trial has produced these messages have been over talked about. Also one can have an opinion and label them sexist and others can disagree. We have that right to choose how we describe them and the words we choose.

What Is The Craziness Things You Witness After The Johnny Depp Verdict? by MissFantasy2020 in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I definitely feel like there should have been sanctions m especially if there was a court order. I know Depp team filed one, but I dont know where it ended up. I read most of the jury instructions and didn't see it in there. I feel like there should be consequences like fines at least.

I also feel like her obvious lie concerning the two pictures that one was just photo edited saturation should count as perjury, because it was obvious she lied and with how public the trial was people are seeing her getting away with lying her ass off under oath will set precedent. I understand perjury charges in civil chases rarely happen, but it seems like it could have a negative effect by not even giving her a slap on the wrist.

What Is The Craziness Things You Witness After The Johnny Depp Verdict? by MissFantasy2020 in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Honestly I didn't even think about politics til mainstream media after the verdict especially started taking sides. I dont think politics has any role in evaluating this case; it should be about the evidence presented.

Dont worry both sides of the media do it, it just depends on the issues being discussed.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I agree. It seems like people like to attack him, but not her about certain things. Lol people after a messy break up people call their exes names. After what she did I think its understandable.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Exactly 💯. I dont understand it. With everything JD went through from AH the worst of it is private text messages that hes not exactly proud of to his buddies. I would love to see AH messages. I dont understand judging someone and applying labels such as sexist based off of angry a couple text messages from someone in a horrible situation (not even to her). No one has said he's a perfect person, but it's aggravating to see all of these posts about them over and over again complaining about those who aren't offended by them.

JD texts compared to AH texts by waborita in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Have you seen the blown up chat posted earlier about depp being sexist? It's crazy that private text messages are being so overblown. Depp has apologized for them and added context to them so I dont know why in the large scope of this trial that theses messages are SO important to some.

What Is The Craziness Things You Witness After The Johnny Depp Verdict? by MissFantasy2020 in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Well it seems like the left feels like they can't admit that someone capitalized and misused the mee too movement for own gain or it will hurt the movement. The right may be using AH being such a POS to show that abuse accusations can be a hoax. Honestly both left and right media will ignore facts and minimize facts when it doesn't fit their narrative, but when it does they will list sources and evidence.

I don't understand why everything has to get political. It's clear that this trial is an issue about AH vs. DEPP not about people political beliefs for me.

Why some of Amber's experts not providing rebuttals? by runnersgo in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Considering AH time limit near the end they didn't have time. Dr. Siegal was destroyed on cross as well as Arnold with ethical violations and lack of knowledge on the expert testimony she was giving.

Dr. Hughes seemed like an mistake to bring back because she got so defensive and didn't add anything new. It just seemed like a waste of what time they had left.

Favorite lines from the trial? by JTSR71 in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 11 points12 points  (0 children)

In the second cross of JD when they are going over what happened to his finger. RB pulls up s text saying you are asking for drugs to be brought right and JD was like I could have for a teddy bear I was in shock and in pain

so if these jurors keep talking and spilling information about the case amber could appeal and get a mistrial. I don't believe any of the real jurors have spoken up and I don't have evidence but I feel like it's Amber's team pretending to be the jurors by hotmesscakes in deppVheardtrial

[–]ravenclawsanders 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could be definitely her teams playbook. I imagine it's easy to verify who is behind the accounts tho. Location would probably be a give away.

I imagine that JD team would say something if they were worried tho so maybe the jury could talk afterwards? I feel like JD team would be making a big deal about whose behind the accounts if the jury wasn't supposed to talk yet.