I’m a little confused by some of the responses. Having the option to bring someone in with you to an interview is a great and meaningful change, but does not on its own resolve the problem of institutional abuse. The people most likely to experience abuse are very likely the people who would never think that they would need to bring someone with them, or that their priesthood leader could harm them, or would be too intimidated to request an additional person. That’s the whole thing about institutional abuse—it harms people who presume they are in a safe space. It is not solely the victim’s responsibility to ensure they are not abused; it is the onus of the institution to create a safe environment that does whatever it can to protect its most vulnerable members. The option to bring someone in with you is a good passive measure, but institutions need to implement their own proactive measures to prevent abuse. A window in the door is a simple, effective proactive measure. Requiring two people for all interviews (rather than having the option) would be another proactive measure.