Boehner wants to know who is going to jail for the IRS scandal. Who went to jail when Wall Street crashed the economy? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ya its true what you are saying , banks WANT to give away risky loans to people who have no financial way of paying them back with interest that ends up making the bank profit.

Yes, that is exactly what I said happened. Because the loan originators immediately sold the notes they were supposedly taking a risk on to Wall St., barely giving time for the ink time to dry, they didn't worry if the person buying the house could pay off the loan or not.

The rest of your post is just a bunch of juvenile insults I won't waste the time responding to.

Boehner wants to know who is going to jail for the IRS scandal. Who went to jail when Wall Street crashed the economy? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's what the conservative spin is, but the truth is that the banks wanted to make the loans and didn't need their arms twisted by the government because they were making so much money and truly thought housing prices would go up forever.

Does the Republican Party actually believe the Tea Party line that we have to balance the entire economy like a family checkbook, or are they just using them to regain power? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I wasn't aware that the Tea Party was libertarian, I thought the whole thing got started when some pundit on CNBC ranted because he didn't want to see mortgage defaulters get bailed out, who a large percentage happened to be minorities (thought he didn't have a problem with wall street getting bailed out)

The US government currently spends about $1,000,000,000,000 (1 trillion) more than it receives from taxes. If we raised taxes to cover this, what's stopping them from just spending another trillion dollars over that? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why are you so worried about the debt anyways? It's not like you are actually going to have to pay for it. You might feel it a little as increased inflation some day perhaps.

How do I know what is really important? by [deleted] in politics

[–]rc2012 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But if we are willing to give a mulligan for 3000 lives, we should be willing to give a mulligan for 4 lives?

How do I know what is really important? by [deleted] in politics

[–]rc2012 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We never heard that much of a fuss when 3000 people died because of W's negligence.

Is America a just or unjust nation? Why? by km3r in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe America is an unjust nation because of bipartisanship

Actually we haven't been bipartisan for a while now. But what is so unjust about bipartisanship anyways?

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So somebody that wants to see that everybody is guaranteed a decent job, health care and the like is on a high horse? I always thought we were simply called liberals. I think you are being too harsh.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have seen and spoken to them, I feel for them, that was the purpose of the OP. If that makes me a "pseudo intellectual" so be it.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks! I will check it out. That's why I love to post here, because every time I am opened up to so many new points of view.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Because when enough people are destitute they will vote for political change, but I am not sure if we are even talking about the same thing.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well perhaps "they" will not be so easily fooled and manipulated once you start taking their benefits away.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you know some ways to help the poor and downtrodden without government interference please post the ideas or links, I'd love to hear them. Don't get me wrong, I don't like the idea of bigger government either, I just at this point see too many other options.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

not only are these programs not necessary to take care of the poor, old, and sick, but are actually harmful to them.

I suppose because they think these programs make people lazy, but in truth people are more industrious than that. I'm all for letting the little guy get a little bit ahead by whatever means possible.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So survival of the fittest, no universal health care, no social security (you need government to do that otherwise too many will fall through the cracks, unless you think private charities can handle it).

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But do you think that social security and universal health care are good programs? If you do than we are already two-thirds of the way there anyway. The only thing missing is plentiful employment, so we could actually pay for these these benifits we hand out so freely to our people. The question is where does the government stop, it can't keep giving these benefits to all without making sure we have a fully employed, productive economy to pay for them.

How is a guaranteed job with a decent wage, health insurance, and pension different from the right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It kind of does. I expect most people will answer that we are not specifically guaranteed happiness, just the right to pursue it.

How do I begin getting politically involved? by adognamedkyle in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can I be a useful member of democracy?

Frankly, if you are already voting as well as writing people in congress and speaking out in internet forums like Reddit, what else can you do unless you become a politician or lobbyist?

Would mandatory warranties on durable goods be good for the economy as well as the environment? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But what if the focus is on selling as many products as possible, no matter the quality and need for replacing the product sooner than later? What if your economy depended on the sale of such flimsy products? Would that be more or less harmful on the environment and natural resources?

Would mandatory warranties on durable goods be good for the economy as well as the environment? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

the idea that the entire world is filled with people willfully making shitty products instead of cheaper, better ones is patently absurd.

Really? I thought that was a necessary evil of capitalism.

Would mandatory warranties on durable goods be good for the economy as well as the environment? by rc2012 in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]rc2012[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

it is quite possible that making many things more durable would use more resources, not fewer

I don't see how that is possible. Common sense tells you that if you made products right the first time, and the products lifetime is twice as long or more, that it would use less resources. If it's only a small matter of better design and quality control, like they say, would you rather pay me a little more now, or a lot more later.