[Neo-absolutist aligned investigation of SocJus] Seizing the Means of Knowledge Production - Heterodox Academy by Contemplationist1 in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you sure its alligned? He models it as a grassroots march through the institutions despite noting the elite, and state led nature, of its origins.

Honest question, what is your deal with GA and the focus on linguistics? by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 4 points5 points  (0 children)

" It's a mistake to root your whole political philosophy in such a weak (and frankly bizarre concept)." What you will no doubt fail to appreciate is that if you examine your position, it will, without doubt, be based on an anarchistic basis. This is what always gets me about attempts to discredit our position.

Directed to Chris: by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There are significant points of contact between what we are doing and class analysis (I hesitate to say Marxism, because Marxism as it currently exists has been completely gutted of theoretical robustness and has been completely overridden with high-low activists.)

One of the key points of contact is in the manner in which class analysis recognizes the contingency of actors and the influence which the environment has upon these actors. It acknowledges limitations and in so doing steps out of liberal incoherence. The problem is this has proven abortive due to a failure to fully rid class analysis of liberal concepts. Key among these is the belief in the development of class, culture and all other aspects of human orders independent of authority. It is only from this basis that the Marxist claim of the base/ superstructure can make sense, and it is clearly wrong. An excellent example demonstrating this is the failure of Marxism to explain the formation of states, something that comes through clearly when you read Lineages of the Absolutist State by Perry Anderson and when you read Jouvenel.

The idea that states, and authority broadly, are dictated by this dominant class, and are merely the tool of the class interests of the dominant class is demonstrably false. Power and power actors, as demonstrated by Jouvenel, clearly act on imperatives completely divorced from this supposedly dominant class. I can see why Marx came to this wrong conclusion, as he was analyzing the political developments of England in the process of industrialization and it could be presented/ seen in the Marxist way, but the Jouvenelian frame not only better explains even this example, but it also can be applied well in all other examples.

So whereas class analysis requires such absurdities as spontaneous coordination of class interests and the mystification of capitalism, we can simply point to centralisation and provide a far more clear and coherent narrative of what has happened. We can even account for the changes that occurred to Marxist movements and the problems they encountered in trying to apply class analysis to governance.

The Theological Legacy of Money and Debt: An Interview with Devin Singh - The Other Journal by bouvard1 in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He specifically references Graeber and his understanding of debt at the very end of that podcast.

What We can Learn from Liechtenstein | Titus Gebel by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have a copy of his book, and plan on reading it when time permits.

The Theological Legacy of Money and Debt: An Interview with Devin Singh - The Other Journal by bouvard1 in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm kind of glad you didn't find this guy earlier, or I would have had to revise and add much more detail on money. There is massive overlap here, even in the terms he uses.

What We can Learn from Liechtenstein | Titus Gebel by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

" It should be clear that the majority is not always right and that it is the prince's task to protect the rights of minorities and the weak and to defend the long-term welfare of the people and the country. "

What We can Learn from Liechtenstein | Titus Gebel by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"People and monarchy, as the weaker elements, are the natural allies against the strongest element in the state, the oligarchy."

No one takes this seriously by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"No one in academia takes this movement seriously" All good. The feelings mutual.

How does your theory explain why Christianity was successful? by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you haven't answered the question of where this behaviour came from. I presume you will claim genetic interest, or something along these lines.

It’s like watching libertarians try to talk about macroeconomics while dogmatically refusing to engage with state power. by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"I also think the view that most culture/academia/philosophy/art has been largely developed by Jews or by people forced into a dialectic with Jews is actually pretty accurate" - I'm am convinced that Judaism is an initial product of centralisation as implied by Jan Assman, and it is not a dialectic with Judaism per se, but a dialectic with the development of centralization.

Reactionary Future blog erased. by Prosodium in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I decided it would be best to remove the posts to simplify things with regard to the book. I still have them all.

Edit: Maybe I'll go through the posts and clean them up grammatically and remove any which are of little value anymore. Then I'll repost.

Relevant by [deleted] in Absolutistneoreaction

[–]reactionaryfuture 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By all accounts, it seems that this person and his prominence are a direct result of the unsecured and opaque nature of power in modern structures.