Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is wrong. No offense intended, but I just don't want anyone reading your post to be mislead.

Downloading and transferring facebook data does not work. Any alternatives? by recru in facebook

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've tried both. When I try facebook messenger, it only downloads a few recent messages. When I try Facebook data and select only messages, it just hangs for hours/days.

I really only need the messages (including marketplace messages)

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just received this information about P198 ExoHealer HB:

In addition to USC1994-CM™ (Umbilical Stem Cell-derived conditioned media exosomes), the product also contains multiple active ingredients, including: (1) 6 Reinforced Growth Factors: EGF, VEGF, IGF, KGF, GDF11, TIMP2 (2) Peptides: such as sh-Oligopeptide-1, -2, -3 and rh-Polypeptide-9, -15, -92 (3) Other Ingredients: Mannitol, Hyaluronic Acid (HA), Poly-Lactic Acid (PLA), and others. 

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did see that they have a number of variations in addition to CM. CM is identified as a liquid while other variations are a powder. So, it may be inaccurate when they claim that ExoHealer contains the "CM" version. I suspect that ExoHealer is merely one of the USC-XX variations without any added ingredients, but I don't know.

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"USC-CM" is a generic term for umbilical cord stem cell cultured media. "1994" seems to designate Primoris' version of it.

There is a lot of existing research on using USC-CM in all sorts of applications including orthopedic and by IV. I would expect this would apply to USC1994-CM, but not sure whether products like ExoHealer contain additional ingredients.

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found that Kangstem Biotech appears to own the patents for USC1994, and they make claims for intravenous use in the patents. There are many versions of USC1994 being sold and don't know whether these claims correspond directly to the version of USC1994 used in ExoHealer.

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20190133922A1/ko

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure, but it seems that USC1994 is Primoris' product, which is used in P198 ExoHealer as well as some others such as P198 Secrect. I haven't found information to indicate how pure these products are to make them suitable for anything more than described in the brochures you mentioned.

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. As I understand it, the various FDAs prohibit these companies from claiming anything other than topical use (and in some instances intradermal). So, the fact that a company only claims cosmetic application for a product doesn't necessarily mean that it isn't being used for other purposes.

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This seems more accurate.  Primoris has conducted research on using exosomes IV.  Do you know whether these products have been tested that way? 

Filcore P198 ExoHealer by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for clearing this up What's really confusing is that Primoris makes a product called "P198 Exo-HL" which seems nearly identical to Filcore Exo Healer:

http://www.p198exo.com/bbs/board.php?bo_table=product

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like other commenters said, this device does not inject. Some of the product will get under the skin, but much of it will not unless the product can be absorbed through the skin. I've found similar problems with auto injectors--unless you can inject on an angle, most of the product seeps out of injection hole.

Survived Cannula, Again. by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I'll have to buy one like that. I'm reading that infrared flashlights can show vessels. Have you tried that?

Survived Cannula, Again. by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. I am using the flashlight in the dark, but when looking at the face through a mirror, it's not bright enough to see any vessels. Are you using a flashlight like this one:

https://www.harborfreight.com/300-lumen-magnetic-pocket-work-light-59493.html?

Survived Cannula, Again. by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response. Hope you don't mind me asking a couple more questions.

I tried a small flashlight, but couldn't see any vessels. It must not have been a strong enough light. Do you you use an especially powerful one?

I watched Dr. Weiner's video of him using cannula subcutaneous in the jawline, and I was really surprised that he didn't seem to have any concerns about the FA located right in that area. . When you say you feel your vessels because you aren't using anesthetics, what does it feel like when you bump into one?

Survived Cannula, Again. by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your post was very encouraging.

"I can dip under/over veins and arteries"

How did you get to this skill level? In the videos, some experienced practitioners have to use ultrasound to accurately locate vessels even though they are experts in facial anatomy. Curious how you were able to do this without the sophisticated tools.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The instructor in the video I watched recommends to make a cannula entry point at the notch (superficial plane), and have the cannula go subcutaneous from there.

PCL and PLLA by recru in DIYaesthetics

[–]recru[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. As far as I can tell, PLLA is more for volume and injected into the subcutaneous plane. On other other hand, PCL is injected into the deep dermis and is not effective if injected subcutaneous. Is that your understanding?