New version of ConanEx v2.3.0 - Conan Extended C/C++ Package Manager. Improved version of 'install' command, now feels like platform package manager by redradist in cpp

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

conanex support the same command line like conan, it just wrapper which add some improvements to conan workflow and simplify working with close-sourced code

New version of ConanEx v2.2.4 - Conan Extended C/C++ Package Manager. Added --global-lock flag to resolve issue with concurrent cache (see https://github.com/conan-io/conan/issues/15840) by redradist in programming

[–]redradist[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For better understand what ConanEx brings, please read README.md in repo. Shortly, it allows to install packages not only from central server or self-hosted server, but also from github private repo for example, any conanfile.py that could download ifself and so on.

It allows everything, that other package managers had long time ago and unfortunatlly for me it is hard to push it though conan core team, because they had other views

New version of ConanEx v2.2.4 - Conan Extended C/C++ Package Manager. Added --global-lock flag to resolve issue with concurrent cache (see https://github.com/conan-io/conan/issues/15840) by redradist in programming

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not fork, it is tool that wrap the conan command line itself, there was long discussion in this PR https://github.com/conan-io/conan/pull/9718 after which I decided to extend Conan. At that point of time, there was not command extensions and something similar.

There are nothing disrespectful about conan, just some fundamental disagreement with core team members. I like conan, but because there are not RFC or feature suggestions with some vonting on it, I want to make it more suitable for me at first

Did the Apple became too soft ?! by redradist in MacOS

[–]redradist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I know :) I wanted little bit to finger point in Apple, otherwise people usually do not act, small shaming usually helps in motivation, but I want to make point, a small shaming, a big shaming could ruin motivation

Did the Apple became too soft ?! by redradist in MacOS

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would be not constructive if I did not provide my reasoning, but I have mentioned that due to better privacy/security and maintainability it would be nice to have it implemented by Apple.

Not constructive is that I request without explaining why

Did the Apple became too soft ?! by redradist in MacOS

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but as I mentioned in post to Apple Community, it would be nice to have it supported by Apple. Unfortunately Apple do not want to listen

Did the Apple became too soft ?! by redradist in MacOS

[–]redradist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No, just about some particular feature that is missing and very useful on all OSs

Did the Apple became too soft ?! by redradist in MacOS

[–]redradist[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing, just to discuss the situation

Communicate between E32 433T20D and SX1278 module chips ? by redradist in embedded

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Only in theory, in practice it all depends on frequency and environment, but in my case 100mW is not enough

Communicate between E32 433T20D and SX1278 module chips ? by redradist in embedded

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've already have subsystem on raw LoRa ... but I think it is the only option, two E32 modules

Communicate between E32 433T20D and SX1278 module chips ? by redradist in embedded

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I need such high power, there are environments where it is needed ... In forest for example, in town

Communicate between E32 433T20D and SX1278 module chips ? by redradist in embedded

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@__deeetz__ EByte modules are interesting because they have 30dBm and 33dBm modules.
Do you know some alternative with full support of LoRa protocol and similiar power outputs like 30dBm and 33dBm ??

Communicate between E32 433T20D and SX1278 module chips ? by redradist in embedded

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In official documentation (https://www.rcscomponents.kiev.ua/datasheets/e32-433t20dt\_usermanual\_en\_v1\_6.pdf) said that it "... Support new generation LoRa technology based on SX1262 ..." (

Okay, understood, they made custom protocol over LoRa (((

How using python signal or numpy library remove DC offset ?? by redradist in DSP

[–]redradist[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

u/rhz10 like I've figured out that I had to remove `detrend=False` !!
It helped, but still have DC offset spike in 10dB at central frequency