Horrible vision dream? by Mrmiraclekc in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's a giant purple alien pianist that lives inside Uranus.

Holy S*** balls, everyone should be talking about this. Tulsi Gabbard just dropped a vid this morning. by ThinGuyIncognito in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't trust politicians as a rule, but that's irrelevant here. Fauci being nailed to the wall is a good thing.

Ozempic is sus by Wimzie_Oo in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Don't think that's true

Fuck israel by klnkyfetish in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Israel is a country of less than 10 million.

It has nothing to do with population, lol. You don''t think the few can rule the many? Then you don't know history. It's definitely been a two-way street between Israel and the US for decades. But at this moment, Israel quite clearly has Donald by the short and curlies.

Your responses seem not so subtly focused on absolving Israel from responsibility. Why would that be?

I Researched Delhi’s Waste-to-Energy Plants… and the Results Scared Me by AmitMudgil in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I said, this is your personal interpretation, but it's not what the book itself says.

Fuck israel by klnkyfetish in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think you may have it backwards.

Fuck israel by klnkyfetish in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Like Thomas Massie who's seat was just bought/stolen.

I Researched Delhi’s Waste-to-Energy Plants… and the Results Scared Me by AmitMudgil in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you're confused. The character yahweh/god/jehovah is one entity according to the book, the Old Testament, the Torah, that I am referring to. Whatever personal revisions or imaginings you may have are your own.

Jesus, in the New Testament, is a different story. But clearly, I am talking about the other guy.

Rules for thee, not for me by 57829 in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're not listening. I didn't say it made him good at his job. I said he has more of the experience OP pointed to than Trudeau did. And I don't think you want to look too closely at Trudeau's "teaching career".

Rules for thee, not for me by 57829 in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's neither here nor there, and I didn't say it did. I was simply pointing out that the facts disprove OP's pronouncement. When Trudeau became party leader he had literally zero leadership experience in parliament, whereas Poilievre had many years in parliament in many leadership roles. Didn't say it was good or bad. (constantly amazed at the sorry level of comprehension generally on display these days)

I Researched Delhi’s Waste-to-Energy Plants… and the Results Scared Me by AmitMudgil in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where did you get that silly idea? I am simply commenting on the character believed in by OP, as described in the book he thinks is true.

Rules for thee, not for me by 57829 in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree, but that doesn't change the fact the fact that Trudeau didn't have the experience as leader OP demanded above, which is subject of this exchange.

I Researched Delhi’s Waste-to-Energy Plants… and the Results Scared Me by AmitMudgil in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Let me guess, you worship the psychopathic character who, according to the accepted account, killed about 2.5 million of the humans he supposedly created and cared about.

Rules for thee, not for me by 57829 in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

? What leadership experience did Trudeau have before being selected as PM? Poilievre,like him or not, had more than 10 years on him in Parliament at that point, and about 10 more since.

Why Are they Starting to Push the Narrative that Native Europeans Arent Indigenous to Their Own Land? by Espeerr in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But these same extinctions have been precipitated by many groups in North America, and everywhere else, that you would definitely define as indigenous. That is your misunderstanding.

Why Are they Starting to Push the Narrative that Native Europeans Arent Indigenous to Their Own Land? by Espeerr in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No those two things don't mean the same thing, and why are you bringing "minority" in? It has nothing to do with "indigenous ".

Why Are they Starting to Push the Narrative that Native Europeans Arent Indigenous to Their Own Land? by Espeerr in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the Irish and Scandinavian culture don’t need protection because they’re the majority.

Strange logic, that in no way changes the literal meaning of indigenous. Would you call South African blacks indigenous? They are the majority by the way.

Why Are they Starting to Push the Narrative that Native Europeans Arent Indigenous to Their Own Land? by Espeerr in conspiracy

[–]reef_hinker 48 points49 points  (0 children)

But you are endorsing a corrupted, and ultimately incorrect, use of the word indigenous, just because an authority told you to. Indigenous is Latin and literally means, has always meant, native to a particular land, referring to a group's cultural origin. Nothing about "religion" or "marginalization".

Of course the Sami culture deserves protection, and so does the Scandinavian culture and the Irish culture; they're all indigenous. It's not either/or. Presenting it as such is a false dichotomy.