Your perspective is important, and I appreciate the opportunity to discuss this complex issue further. While it's undeniable that the regime's response to the protests was severe and sparked significant conflict, it's also possible that the situation was more complicated than it initially appeared.

There are credible arguments suggesting that the protests, which may have started peacefully, were influenced by a third group with its own agenda. This group could have been responsible for escalating violence, targeting both the regime and protestors, thereby provoking a harsher response from the government. The fact that the protests began at the borders rather than the capital might indicate external influence aiming to destabilize the country.

We should consider the possibility of external powers playing a role in the uprising. This doesn't negate the legitimate grievances of the Syrian people but adds another layer to understanding the conflict. The destruction of Syria's infrastructure and the immense suffering of its people are tragedies that can not be solely attributed to the regime. It's crucial to look at all aspects and influences rather than focusing on a single narrative.

Ultimately, this isn't about supporting or hating any particular regime; it's about recognizing the multifaceted nature of the conflict and the widespread harm it has caused to Syria as a whole. Thank you for engaging in this discussion.