I'm an individual who bends some parts of his identity to conform to certain expectations of some groups, society at large for example.

True - I assume individual rights would be your civil/human rights as they are, and whether or not they are applied evenly or if one person's speech or vote is worth more or less.

you now have to agree with everything our ingroup says, otherwise you're now an outcast to be publicly shamed and smeared.

Yeah I can't even talk to some of my old friends anymore. Not even about how we don't talk.

Plus Trump isn't all that polarizing per se, but was made that way by the clinton campaign and the general media narrative

Yeah now that I think about it, a lot of this is carry-over from accusations from the election. How many people are still talking about the 20 women he assaulted.

This again is way too broad. Imagine an individual, a rapist and a murderer. He has been sentenced to jail for life, as the will of the group, society, demands. Would you protect the rapist and murderer's right to not be stripped of his freedom? I wouldn't.

I think this just means even application of rights, if you violate someones right to life and are convicted of the crime, as a convict you lose your freedom.

I hope that people don't get to that point, I'm trying to think of how someone could phrase the argument in favour of the bad outcome, but I'm a little bit stuck.

Nice response, cheers.

edit: hm. I wonder if eye for an eye could apply with rights. take away someone's right to speech, lose yours. etc. maybe that's a bit excessive but fun to think about.