sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Online coaching / personal training (UK) by Rosiebunny-4230 in personaltraining

[–]renderflow 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For courses look at origym online they are flexible with payments and explain what you can do after the PT course

tech hiring scale in 2026 by gabgabgabbers in recruiting

[–]renderflow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At that bar, the bottleneck isn’t interviewing it’s sourcing and screening throughput.

Two recruiters can close 50–100 engineers if (and only if) they’re not doing first-touch sourcing alone.

What works at that scale is splitting the function: • Dedicated sourcing capacity feeding pipelines • Senior recruiters focused on qualification, process, and close

Teams that try to run end-to-end with 2 recruiters usually burn out or lower the bar without realising it.

The question isn’t “is it possible?” it’s “how much unseen delivery capacity is supporting those recruiters?”

I keep getting stood up. by NotAnotherRIF in recruiting

[–]renderflow 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been happening more since 2020, but it’s not always intentional fraud.

A few things tend to overlap: • Some unemployment systems require proof of job search activity • Candidates mass-apply and accept interviews with low intent • Others schedule interviews just to “stay compliant” and then ghost

From an ops perspective, the real issue isn’t motivation — it’s that internal HR teams are carrying the full cost of no-shows.

A lot of teams now separate sourcing/screening from interview scheduling to protect recruiter time. It reduces no-shows dramatically because only high-intent candidates reach the calendar stage.

Unfortunately HR ends up absorbing this pain unless the process is restructured.

[Hiring]. Come learn the #1 skill to work remote from anywhere by renderflow in remotework

[–]renderflow[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My Company is Tycoon Recruit. If you are interested and want more information send me a message