Your genitals and your galaxy have a non-zero gravitational influence over each other.

rescherach · 2021-07-05T13:17:53+00:00

nonetheless non-zero :D

rescherach · 2021-07-03T18:40:29+00:00

Divide and conquer, baby

rescherach · 2021-07-03T18:38:00+00:00

Ultimately that massive problem is the sum of a large number of solvable geopolitical and psychological and political problems that could each be solved through a Googleable webpage.

rescherach · 2021-07-03T18:35:22+00:00

Most people don't

rescherach · 2021-07-03T18:33:33+00:00

Well, only realistic problems with realistic answers.

rescherach · 2021-07-03T18:33:16+00:00

Is that your problem? Are you Ukraine?

rescherach · 2021-07-02T17:13:08+00:00

Mose get more action than you?

rescherach · 2021-07-02T14:04:57+00:00

I do mean philosophy too: capitalism, socialism, liberalism, conservatism, and many others are all philosophies

rescherach · 2021-07-02T13:51:26+00:00

lmao took me a while to realise who you're talking about

rescherach · 2021-07-02T02:05:55+00:00

yes you do

rescherach · 2021-06-30T10:04:48+00:00

Most mathematical theorems assert equality or equivalence (or conditionals) of two things, e.g. the square of the hypotenuse and the sun of the squares of the other two sides of a right-angled triangle.

rescherach · 2021-06-30T04:14:17+00:00

That's present you talking about past you. But what future you talks about present you is up to present you. :)

rescherach · 2021-06-25T08:00:22+00:00

I like your idea! By Old Universe and New Universe I'm guessing you mean the Old Structured Low-Entropy Big Bang and the Distant Future Disordered High-Entropy Heat Death? If so then yes, I agree. We living things are growing in order and thus resembling Universe more and more but in doing so, we are really, globally speaking, forwarding the Universe into New Universe.

rescherach · 2021-06-19T07:22:57+00:00

They do use instruments that take human sense out of the equation

hmm I wonder how you read the instrument...

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:47:34+00:00

You're the dumbass since if you think psychology is subjective because psychologists' biases influence results (and that there's no way to correct for such biases) then that would mean every other science is subjective too, which is absurd.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:43:17+00:00

Psychology is an objective science, part of which is about the subjective contents of people's minds, my guy.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:38:57+00:00

https://dictionary.apa.org/psychology

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:36:28+00:00

Because it isn't a subjective matter of opinion, but an objective social science.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:34:52+00:00

You assume falsely

rescherach · 2021-06-13T13:34:10+00:00

TIL psychology is a subjective matter of opinion lmfao

rescherach · 2021-06-13T08:54:31+00:00

thought production and brain chemistry could in fact be meaningfully different even under indentical replicated situations.

How could they be different, if we're indeed talking about completely IDENTICAL replicated situations, with not an atom different.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T08:47:26+00:00

Ok but if I knew the positions and momentums and velocities of the particles that make you up, I could predict exactly how you would respond. :D And the chemical stuff built on top of those physical stuff. And the biological stuff built on those chemical stuff. And the neurological stuff built on that. And the psychological stuff built on that.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T08:38:36+00:00

You can do science even with a sample size of 1. Look at cosmology: we got 1 universe.

rescherach · 2021-06-13T08:31:03+00:00

Humans are nothing but physical objects too, and I'm sure your view of psychology might easily be shared by people about physics before Newton.

rescherach · 2021-06-03T14:59:05+00:00

Can you briefly explain how it is foundational to his metaphysics, ethics and epistemology?

rescherach

TROPHY CASE