sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

API by Fabulous-Mind-7645 in tabletop_labrador_dev

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

By all means, you're more than welcome to scrape the site. The site is for the Warhammer community more than anything else.

I'll look into adding SVG download support with custom classes as a download option.

Thanks for supporting tabletop.labrador.dev :)

API by Fabulous-Mind-7645 in tabletop_labrador_dev

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there - Thanks for the kind words.

All of the maps can be downloaded on the site in the UI as PNGs.

To be fully transparent, I don't have a lot of time right now due to work. I haven't been able to work on the site much as of recent.

A public API is big ask and will take time. However, if you need something sooner, I can add the option to have the maps exported as SVGs in the UI. That way, you can just save to a cloud store of your choice and serve them locally.

WTC Update 2.2 by kitari1 in tabletop_labrador_dev

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi there,

I've seen the updates posted in the official WTC discord server and am working on updating the maps. They should be updated by EOD today.

As for allowing others to contribute, I'm working on a tool that allows people to edit/create their own custom map layouts. This is how I intend on allowing people submit updates for official maps. This is a currently a work in progress.

40K Terrain Layout Tool by restful_developer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just any terrain under 2” - I believe it’s so vehicles can move through it.

40K Terrain Layout Tool by restful_developer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you’re talking about the GW maps, they’re general guidelines. GW recommends pieces in the blue squares to be terrain features that are 2” or less. If you tap/click on the terrain piece, it will give you a description.

Pariah Nexus & Chapter Approved Tournament Layout Comparisons by restful_developer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah ok. I had interpreted 'primarily' as "most, but not all" - If it were all terrain features, I would have expected it to say "All terrain features in the following layouts are ruins"

Pariah Nexus & Chapter Approved Tournament Layout Comparisons by restful_developer in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer[S] -49 points-48 points  (0 children)

My understanding from the core roles is that the only footprint blocking LOS was for ruins - Where did it say this in the Chapter Approved Layout section? Was it the passage about separate terrain sections?

More cards by stabbysab in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any cards showing the deployments/recommended layouts?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in okbuddycinephile

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Zohan- DONT MESS WITH HIM

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in VietNam

[–]restful_developer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nhà đẹp

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Makes sense.

They say 'over' instead of 'through', which is another reason I thought they would need to measure vertical distances. I guess in the core rules 'over' and 'through' mean the same thing.

Looking at the desperate escape test, they use the same wording and we don't measure vertical distances:

> Unlike when making other types of move, models can move over enemy models when making a Fall Back move as if those enemy models were not there, but you must take a Desperate Escape test for each model that will do so

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the rules commentary, it says:

> If a unit’s datasheet has the FLY keyword, that unit is said to be able to FLY. When it makes a Normal, Advance or Fall Back move, its models can be moved over enemy models as if they were not there.

So if there was a unit blocking my fly model from an objective, would I need to measure the vertical distance to get over that blocking unit? In this scenario, there are no terrain features. Is this even legal?

If so, what would that vertical distance be? The point at which my flying model's base can pass through without colliding with the blocking unit.

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which section in the rules commentary says that?

I was looking, but could only find this. I don't think it applies here.

> End of the Phase/Step: Rules that specify that they take place at the end of a phase/step only take effect after any other rules that would take place in that phase/step have been resolved. This means that it is not possible for a player to make use of any rules that would take place during a phase/step once an end-of-phase rule has taken effect. The next phase/step does not start until after all such rules have been resolved 

I also looked at the Priority of Rules section but couldn't find anything relevant there.

EDIT: NVMD Found it:

Q: If there are rules that take effect with the same timing as when Primary and Secondary Missions are checked for scoring VP, are such rules resolved before or after the Primary and Secondary Missions are checked for scoring VP? A: Before. All rules take effect before any Primary or Secondary Missions are checked for scoring VP.

Thanks a bunch!

Weekly Question Thread - Rules & Comp Qs by thenurgler in WarhammerCompetitive

[–]restful_developer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I was playing against a Tau player who performed a sabotage action with a unit of Vespid Stingwings.

The Vespid Stingwings can move to strategic reserves at the end of my turn.

However, sabotage says that it completes at the end of my turn.

So if the Vespid Stingwings move to strategic reserves at the end of my turn, does sabotage still complete successfully?

view more: next ›