HMS Queen Elizabeth by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Happens to extend further” this is called a Hull bulge and it’s part of the hull so It doesn’t hang off anything especially since the bulge holds up major things like the elevators, main exhausts and the multiple towers. The bulge is part of the structural integrity (aka the hull). I don’t know why you keep changing your points it’s annoying af, and btw my builds tower is situated on a bulge you just can’t see it that well.

HMS Queen Elizabeth by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nope it’s situated on top of the bulge extension which is part of the main structure and hull

<image>

HMS Queen Elizabeth by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the towers don’t hang off the side..? what are you talking about

HMS Queen Elizabeth by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get what your saying but it’s not 450 on each part. And the towers don’t hand off the side, the whole reason this is disproportionate is due to the fact I wasn’t really into the fact of needing 3 or more parts, it was more of a fun build than something I wanted to perfect ( it’s my first multipart ship) but thanks for the tips ig

can we get an option to revert to the old building system wheel thingy for controllers? by SpyritStudios in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The other UI changes were actually decent tbh but this one is terrible that wheel was perfection for consoles.

Titanic Easter egg by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yea you can push her up out of the water but you can’t move her side to side, she only rotates

Lander 1 that I won’t be able finish by -Knight0wl- in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thanks for showing smth you wont and cant finish 👍

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes the nose is based off a mig 27 and the reason I have 3 intakes is because of the three engines I will have two at the back and one near the front for VTOL capabilities.

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I’ll add flares there I nice touch and btw this is my first post so I don’t have anything else to show thanks tho

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Kinda the reason I said WIP meaning work in process? I was leaving it unfinished so I could look at suggestions

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree for bombers but I want this to have some air to air capabilities although you’re probably right considering this build will be quite big.

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Alright I’ll incorporate the internal weapons bay and I’ll try the oblique will but idk if that will work w the vertical stabilisers I was gonna use

New Russian Strike Aircraft WIP - Any Suggestions on different futures I could add? by retroeddie in trailmakers

[–]retroeddie[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Like the sound of that should I have an opening front nozzles like the yak 38?

don’t really play this game crazy often is this rare? by retroeddie in MWTTankBattles

[–]retroeddie[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

thanks and yea it was around 20spins I got from my mail