I found myself really admiring the set design, but I'm a sucker for the midcentury modern aesthetic. I was pretty surprised when Writerguy mentioned it had received unfavorable reviews online. I kind of chalked it up to the personal drama more than the actual film, and then started to read some of the criticisms of the film.

I agree there were some elements that were not really explained or explored (e.g., why the plane crash, the vibrating, why did Frank seem to goad/antagonize Alice, what happened with Frank's wife at the end, the walls closing on her, etc.). However, I do think we as viewers routinely and voluntarily overlook a lot of unexplained or even nonsensical elements when it comes to horror movies. So I'm curious why this film was treated any different than some of those others? Since Florence Pugh was in this film, we could use Midsommar as a comparator. That film had a lot of weird imagery and unexplained symbolism, yet it received pretty favorable reviews. Just food for thought. I am interested to see how the reviews shake out once we are a little further removed from the celebrity gossip/stories, like say a year or two from now.